[Dots] (Authors-Action Required): IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 21 September 2018 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98438130E80; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:20:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1V3NuMTaMywH; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta136.mail.business.static.orange.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478191292F1; Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:20:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.68]) by opfednr26.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42GhkD1cJ7z11cH; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:20:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.19]) by opfednr04.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 42GhkD0l3Nz1xnr; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:20:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM44.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b08d:5b75:e92c:a45f%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 21 Sep 2018 07:20:03 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-data-channel@ietf.org>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: (Authors-Action Required): IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel
Thread-Index: AdRRarojOS45oYXCQDKC72+4KHM8cw==
Importance: high
X-Priority: 1
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 05:20:02 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE389A@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE389AOPEXCLILMA3corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/EoZufL1r0_RiB6JWmJH8QYMhO_o>
Subject: [Dots] (Authors-Action Required): IPR Check for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2018 05:20:14 -0000

Hi co-authors,

In order to help preparing the write-up for draft-ietf-dots-data-channel, we need to answer this question:

(7) Has each author confirmed that any and all appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed. If not, explain why?

As far as I'm concerned, I don't hold any IPR nor I'm aware of any related to this draft.

Please reply ASAP (keep ccing the WG).

Thank you