Re: [Dots] About modification of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-18

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Thu, 25 July 2019 20:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37001201DB; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.091, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OTErOCWo1RWx; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-f41.google.com (mail-ua1-f41.google.com [209.85.222.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09AD51201D1; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-f41.google.com with SMTP id j2so20410351uaq.5; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ad7PlGrbp2funinsaoqpFoDHcgSzmNhsoRDiOB68pxw=; b=K40ep6h5IZJi4E4pShNtCVNBg36oRjJsoGA3BrdfivEjZHtUZ3FUxmbsxvt9sULdVa hxGDmB6k4iirLsqDwQW7kSFjtbNJnsEYE5ZetQszfLFiuK+s+beHAkGW7JnVuLl7zBrw riNbYSt+HuuA3DEWOGoSNOK88vQLZdUunagJeqJyV7kj1W84h6Bbf5ndjttd5aVITz/e /Lv6SuZIWwAaUhPF+PHeWp7IiHBhyEcWKCFxJwq8YSJw/y3OS4a6bokRPWPR+N5t2uYL asRGtKAAsCfxo0Y1svUVCKi4My7bgxPRlDQLwTHKaWvFuCvFrJuGCXOIL+V+mKjjJycg N2Lw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVW638/0nqRDcn6LUaGGczFl7hYqAF6MFdl0YuSA3FrQGm2HxGz qqRgRVIGu9Y7BTW1V+wdWBV040uBj4akJLCj97Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxl6iTpZSRekgBq4gDUO3wxPxnYC7Sope6o8T96UjiSlzGo+KGUUCBAnNsZoeY+jhWJtMm66WRFhHTGosJ2FsA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:2e0e:: with SMTP id t14mr40949856uaj.119.1564087481080; Thu, 25 Jul 2019 13:44:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAA8pjUM-5QPQZNfFAwG_1rQ02-Hy7pDjyBn2fZ1RRank+UaHRw@mail.gmail.com> <CALZ3u+ZGPwypx4F-a1aX9DKBpC9B-Ls_D1ZgnH4am-rd6tx6gA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALZ3u+ZGPwypx4F-a1aX9DKBpC9B-Ls_D1ZgnH4am-rd6tx6gA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:44:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTkk+04hVzNLcHQS-xizhASoqdjRMtSoT_ZNvcXRGLbJYnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com>
Cc: H Y <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com>, "draft-ietf-dots-use-cases@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-use-cases@ietf.org>, dots <dots@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5230c058e877e72"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/GSyleG3Jhl56XLf8wtv4AQOxXZM>
Subject: Re: [Dots] About modification of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-18
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2019 20:44:44 -0000

Hi,

If that text is believed to be clearer, I am fine with it. Anyone opposed
to the text ?
Yours,
Daniel

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 4:08 PM Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Peace,
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 10:28 PM H Y <yuuhei.hayashi@gmail.com>; wrote:
> > I just appended the below sentence to 3.3. DDoS Orchestration of
> > draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-18.
>
> IMO this, from the architectural point of view, is quite an obvious
> use case which doesn't have a lot to do with orchestration itself,
> because it is mostly covered (in a different set of words) in 3.1.
>
> That being said, I'm personally fine with incorporating this into the
> draft if Kaname believes this provides a better guidance for
> implementers.
>
> --
> Töma
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>