[Dots] Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance check

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Mon, 29 October 2018 17:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C35131026 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bxFvMEi0A07Y for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961D9131023 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 10:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9THBmOX001851; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:11:49 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu w9THBmOX001851
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1540833109; bh=m++DzV09xWAnbIu9n2I7Ylnf3EMGqb+IDSkRFSZcr7o=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=Athl9KOjzkV07w8uC+uQw2iM8lI+jYc1JVGtTBu6CkhLzgBiBtqsy9nAXIDy8QrYL Pw4ULv21u83AjFAddY9TAX4UV0TGzX8tAVaN6f8fAtvKtYMljarx5oWew8QwQUjWa/ 3rjiWCTxYh/+gpSxGJ0aHOFQcHW0AI1MFV99L2s0=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w9THBkRp032752; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:11:46 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Mon, 29 Oct 2018 13:11:46 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
CC: "nteague@verisign.com" <nteague@verisign.com>, "rgm@labs.htt-consult.com" <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>, "stefan.fouant@copperriverit.com" <stefan.fouant@copperriverit.com>
Thread-Topic: Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance check
Thread-Index: AdRvqmd7N9ly1zhyRTeZI8TDkhu8jQ==
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:11:45 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0181A3479E@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/JmnHAYRbtIIu8ANcgjqHcZjs9e4>
Subject: [Dots] Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance check
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 17:11:56 -0000

Hello!

The use case draft (draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-16) is ready for publication but is awaiting a shepherd write-up.  As the document shepherd, I need help from this draft's authors to complete the write-up as was noted in [1].  Specifically, I need to assert that that the IPR issues per BCP 78/79  have been filed.

Daniel helpfully started a thread of public assertions on IPR from the authors: 
** Daniel Migault: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02707.html
** Frank Xialiang: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02708.html
** Roland Dobbins: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02710.html
** Kaname Nishizuka: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02711.html

A response is still needed from Stefan Fouant, Nik Teague and Robert Moskowitz.

Stefan/Nik/Bob: can you please respond to Daniel's thread on IPR.

Thanks,
Roman

[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02715.html