IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dots] Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Mon, 04 February 2019 19:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EA3130EE6 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:04:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J8VOW8eWfUSZ for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:04:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E6C130EEC for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 11:04:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x14J40Zs038332 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:04:00 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu x14J40Zs038332
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1549307040; bh=GktmpV3Oeco7S+1YB4KJ7qiFCs0F0Qkqa67tmtlPOvs=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=CCNvII4R7VMnK2AHu3ehlrKBodvqkVIXLA1flLRsTmwKF7Oqn+iSnCaF8+MccT/dd TVXlhIabrEV7VRy2xAhOJmUpE1OUiE3y7OaWXYEqmpsKQkZuACex6dRpThttZF+iZy STzv9F69emE79Wmu5ecy1+7+yvldc9EIyKttRxYA=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x14J3roP008049 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:03:53 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0435.000; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 14:03:53 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture
Thread-Index: AdS8u2RatjXyeujWSNi2qQvwlChSXQ==
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:03:52 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC01857A7D95@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/K3KyCmM3y-hD5RgOoqHXw9Nb45Q>
Subject: [Dots] Items from shepherd review of draft-ietf-dots-architecture
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:04:07 -0000

Hello!

I found a few issues using idnits when completing my shepherd write-up of draft-ietf-dots-architecture.  Could these please be fixed and a -11 published.

(1) No IANA Considerations section.  While there is no action for IANA, the next needs to explicitly say something to that effect.  See Section2.2 of https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist

(2) A few of the references need to be updates.  From IDnits:

--[ snip ]--
  == Outdated reference: A later version (-18) exists of
     draft-ietf-dots-requirements-16

  == Outdated reference: A later version (-17) exists of
     draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-16

  == Outdated reference: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang has been published as RFC
     8512

  -- Obsolete informational reference (is this intentional?): RFC 5246
     (Obsoleted by RFC 8446)
--[snip]--

Thanks,
Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email