[Dots] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 03 February 2020 11:25 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-architecture@ietf.org, Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, dots-chairs@ietf.org, valery@smyslov.net, dots@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <158072914537.28494.3365896645105885199.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2020 03:25:45 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/LwlnOkzZX_3RAEy0ZytuPwC6eoo>
Subject: [Dots] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dots-architecture-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-architecture/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe double-check use of normative language. There seem to be a few occasions
where normative language could be used but isn't.

[Dots] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker