[Dots] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-14: (with COMMENT)

Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 05 November 2020 13:56 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DADE3A1185; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 05:56:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Magnus Westerlund via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery@ietf.org, dots-chairs@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, valery@smyslov.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.21.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Message-ID: <160458459549.15207.15947838166522017934@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 05:56:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/ORsdJIu1mP6EetFwPT6m0pxqQAg>
Subject: [Dots] Magnus Westerlund's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:56:36 -0000

Magnus Westerlund has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Shouldn't the security consideration section 8.2 ave some additional warnings
about the ease of affecting the dns lookup when .local is used. This as mDNS
more easily can be gamed?