Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05

["Jon Shallow" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Med,

That suggestion works for me - thanks.  No need to reference HE.

Regards

Jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto: [e-mail]] On Behalf Of
[e-mail]
> Sent: 07 November 2019 06:49
> To: Jon Shallow; 'Valery Smyslov'; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> 
> Hi Jon,
> 
> OK, thanks.
> 
> In order to further make things clear, I suggest to add this NEW text in
the
> introduction of Section 5:
> 
>    The list of the IP addresses returned by DHCP servers is typically
>    used to fed the DOTS server selection procedure detailed in
>    Section 4.3 of [I-D.ietf-dots-signal-channel] or to provide DOTS
>    agents with primary and backup IP addresses of their peer DOTS
>    agents.
> 
> Would that be OK?
> 
> I'm not sure the text need to hint any priority order set by the server
> (backup case), though. The reason is that list will be ordered by the
client
> following HE.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Jon Shallow [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Envoyé : mercredi 6 novembre 2019 17:23
> > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; 'Valery Smyslov'; [e-mail]; dots-
> > [e-mail]
> > Objet : RE: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> >
> > Hi Med,
> >
> > Sorry - not thinking straight - yes, you are correct in that a single
> > OPTION_Vx_DOTS_ADDRESS can contain multiple IP addresses - must have
> glazed
> > over the specific definition before hitting the "it MUST only use the
first
> > instance" in the next section (Client Behavior).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dots [mailto: [e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> > [e-mail]
> > > Sent: 06 November 2019 15:52
> > > To: Jon Shallow; 'Valery Smyslov'; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > >
> > > Hi Jon,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the comments.
> > >
> > > Please see inline.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Med
> > >
> > > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > > De : Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Jon Shallow
> > > > Envoyé : mercredi 6 novembre 2019 15:59
> > > > À : 'Valery Smyslov'; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > > > Objet : Re: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > I have read through draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05 and think
that
> > it
> > > > is
> > > > a good document.
> > > >
> > > > However, in particular with DHCPv(4|6), it is only possible to use
the
> > > > first
> > > > OPTION_Vx_DOTS_ADDRESS (5.1.3, 5.2.3).
> > >
> > > [Med] Yes
> > >
> > >   If the server at the first address
> > > > is down / unavailable for whatever reason, it is not possible to
define
> > a
> > > > backup IP address as a secondary entry.  Is it the intention to not
> > allow
> > > > backup IP addresses?
> > >
> > > [Med] Hmm, that is possible given that an instance is designed to
carry a
> > list
> > > of IP addresses.
> > >
> > >    If the DHCP client receives OPTION_V6_DOTS_ADDRESS only, the
> > >    address(es) included in OPTION_V6_DOTS_ADDRESS are used to reach
> the
> > >    ^^^^^^^^^^
> > >    peer DOTS agent.  In addition, these addresses can be used as
> > >    identifiers for authentication.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > With DNS, I know that A/AAAA records can be presented round-robin
> > > which
> > > > gives the possibility of backup IP addresses, but am not sure
whether
> > this
> > > > holds true for implementations for other Resource Records.  If
backup
> > > > addresses are to be allowed, the draft is unclear whether only the
> > first
> > > > A/AAAA RR is allowed, or each can be tested until the first
non-failure
> > is
> > > > found, or whether happy-eyeballs it to be invoked against all of the
IP
> > > > addresses and then the final IP preferentially chosen according to
the
> > RR
> > > > returned order.
> > >
> > > [Med] Considerations related to address selection (including HE) are
not
> > > detailed here on purpose because this is not part of discovery.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Jon
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Dots [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> > > Valery
> > > > > Smyslov
> > > > > Sent: 23 October 2019 08:37
> > > > > To: [e-mail]
> > > > > Cc: [e-mail]
> > > > > Subject: [Dots] WGLC on draft-ietf-dots-server-discovery-05
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > this message starts a Work Group Last Call (WGLC) for
> > > > draft-ietf-dots-server-
> > > > > discovery-05.
> > > > > The version to be reviewed is here:
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dots-
> > > > > server-discovery-05.txt
> > > > >
> > > > > The WGLC will last for two weeks and will end on November the 7th.
> > > > > Please send your comments to the list before this date.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Frank & Valery.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > > [e-mail]
> > > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Dots mailing list
> > > > [e-mail]
> > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dots mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots