[Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: (with COMMENT)

Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 05 October 2022 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59C2C14CE45; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 16:21:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Duke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks@ietf.org, dots-chairs@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, valery@smyslov.net, valery@smyslov.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <166501206973.46010.9846790337731787136@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 16:21:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/QByoZYsx4sJsQK2VovSEFTjD9ZA>
Subject: [Dots] Martin Duke's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 23:21:09 -0000

Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

"NON_PROBING_WAIT:
is used to limit the potential wait needed calculated when using PROBING_RATE."

I think there is a grammar problem here, and I can't parse this definition.