Re: [Dots] WGLC for draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-01

supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com Mon, 12 October 2020 11:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jon.shallow@jpshallow.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AF03A0E7D for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oXjZX2onTvX7 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:55:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpshallow.com (mail.jpshallow.com [217.40.240.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360B83A0E82 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 04:55:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.jpshallow.com ([192.168.0.3] helo=N01332) by mail.jpshallow.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <jon.shallow@jpshallow.com>) id 1kRwQS-0008Uz-7a; Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:55:36 +0100
From: supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, 'Valery Smyslov' <valery@smyslov.net>, dots@ietf.org
Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis@ietf.org
References: <14ca01d69bd5$dbf0d0a0$93d271e0$@smyslov.net> <6541_1602501654_5F843C16_6541_51_9_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303155DA30@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <6541_1602501654_5F843C16_6541_51_9_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303155DA30@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 12:55:33 +0100
Message-ID: <035801d6a08e$96db1a30$c4914e90$@jpshallow.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHaSW9CC59W3Vb/kWpl9RTUAcwqaQDTd7gwqYXoLlA=
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/RPP8GsENamFiBUqPIVhsXTMuH1o>
Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC for draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-01
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 11:55:43 -0000

Hi Med,

I am not convinced that we can use MUST as in "peers MUST negotiate" as this
has not been significantly adopted yet in the major TLS libraries (I have
only found one TLS library in my searches) and so wonder if it should be a
SHOULD.


Regards

Jon

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto: dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> Sent: 12 October 2020 12:21
> To: Valery Smyslov; dots@ietf.org
> Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dots] WGLC for draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-01
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> We are considering making this change in Section 7.2 (when TLS1.3 is
> supported):
> 
> ==
> NEW:
>    (D)TLS 1.3 has support for PKI certificate compression
>    [I-D.ietf-tls-certificate-compression] which can reduce the initial
>    setup time when using PKI.  The DOTS peers MUST negotiate this
>    extension as per Section 3 of [I-D.ietf-tls-certificate-compression].
> ==
> 
> Please note that:
> * I-D.ietf-tls-certificate-compression will be published as RFC8879
> * I-D.ietf-tls-certificate-compression has a dependency on
draft-kucherawy-
> rfc8478bis which is in the RFC Editor queue as well but with a state set
to
> "IESG". After checking with Murray, it seems that the issue will be
cleared
> soon and the document will be back to the AUTH48 state. See
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8878
> 
> Comments are welcome.
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Valery Smyslov [mailto:valery@smyslov.net]
> > Envoyé : mardi 6 octobre 2020 13:43
> > À : dots@ietf.org
> > Cc : dots-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis@ietf.org
> > Objet : WGLC for draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-01
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > this message starts a two-week working group last call for draft-
> > ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-01, which will end on Wednesday, October 21.
> > Please, review the draft carefully and send your comments to the
> > mailing list.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Frank & Valery.
> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________
> ______________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
recu ce
> message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots