[Dots] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-14: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 20 October 2022 01:14 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases@ietf.org, dots-chairs@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, valery@smyslov.net, valery@smyslov.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <166622845914.37367.15387394013284328699@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 18:14:19 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/WRh5k5q4iRMBtVRUcUDGz7k8iOc>
Subject: [Dots] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-14: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-telemetry-use-cases/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you to Phillip Hallam-Baker for the SECDIR review.

** Section 4.

Some use cases involve controllers, orchestrators, and programmable
   interfaces.  These interfaces can be misused by misbehaving nodes to
   further exacerbate DDoS attacks.

This is good advice.  I recommend calling out that that these security
considerations are for end-to-end systems for DoS mitigation.  These mechanics
are outside the scope of DOTS protocols and standardization activity.

** Section 6.

   Thanks to Donald Eastlake, Phillip Hallam-Baker, Sean Turner, and
   Peter Yee for the IESG review

I’m sure these reviews appreciate the acknowledgement.  To clarify, these were
the directorate reviewers, not the IESG.

[Dots] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker