Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04

["Valery Smyslov" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

we received a lot of replies supporting adoption of the document.
So, the document is adopted. Authors, please re-submit it as WG draft.

A couple of comments.
1. The draft uses few times a keyword "MAY NOT". This combination is not
     among the list of RFC requirement keywords (it is not listed neither
     in RFC2119, nor in RFC8174). If the intent was to use RFC requirement
     language, then I'd suggest replacing it with one of MUST NOT, SHALL
NOT,
     SHOULD NOT. Otherwise please make it lowcase.

2. When describing transport, the draft allows both TLS and DTLS. What
     makes me confusing is that the draft describes it several times as
"TCP/TLS or DTLS".
     Why TCP is ever mentioned here? We all know that TLS usually runs over 
     TCP (however we now have QUICK) and DTLS runs over UDP. 
     The way it is presented in the draft makes me think that probably 
     plain TCP is also allowed as a transport, but is seems to contradict 
     everything I read about DOTS. Am I missing something here?

Regards,
Valery.



> Hi all,
> 
> the chairs recently received an adoption request for
draft-reddy-dots-home-
> network-04.
> 
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-
> network-04.
> The call ends up on Tuesday, April the 23rd.
> 
> Please send your opinion regarding adoption of this document to the list
> before this date.
> If you think the draft should be adopted, please indicate whether you're
willing
> to review it/to work on it. If you think the draft should not be adopted,
please
> explain why.
> 
> Regards,
> Frank & Valery.