Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04

"Valery Smyslov" <> Wed, 24 April 2019 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C1E1202FD; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SINa-M1VSVj1; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62AC3120154; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] (port=59695 helo=svannotebook) by with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <>) id 1hJA2R-0006n3-Oz; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 01:01:44 -0400
From: Valery Smyslov <>
References: <023d01d4ee1f$c2bcb190$483614b0$>
In-Reply-To: <023d01d4ee1f$c2bcb190$483614b0$>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:01:40 +0300
Message-ID: <019001d4fa5a$cf08fb60$6d1af220$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQJbKhUsh7U/p5pdx+eMSV8unPEt3aU+XFBg
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname -
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain -
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain -
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: authenticated_id:
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-network-04
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 05:01:48 -0000


we received a lot of replies supporting adoption of the document.
So, the document is adopted. Authors, please re-submit it as WG draft.

A couple of comments.
1. The draft uses few times a keyword "MAY NOT". This combination is not
     among the list of RFC requirement keywords (it is not listed neither
     in RFC2119, nor in RFC8174). If the intent was to use RFC requirement
     language, then I'd suggest replacing it with one of MUST NOT, SHALL
     SHOULD NOT. Otherwise please make it lowcase.

2. When describing transport, the draft allows both TLS and DTLS. What
     makes me confusing is that the draft describes it several times as
     Why TCP is ever mentioned here? We all know that TLS usually runs over 
     TCP (however we now have QUICK) and DTLS runs over UDP. 
     The way it is presented in the draft makes me think that probably 
     plain TCP is also allowed as a transport, but is seems to contradict 
     everything I read about DOTS. Am I missing something here?


> Hi all,
> the chairs recently received an adoption request for
> network-04.
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-reddy-dots-home-
> network-04.
> The call ends up on Tuesday, April the 23rd.
> Please send your opinion regarding adoption of this document to the list
> before this date.
> If you think the draft should be adopted, please indicate whether you're
> to review it/to work on it. If you think the draft should not be adopted,
> explain why.
> Regards,
> Frank & Valery.