IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06

Dan Wing <danwing@gmail.com> Tue, 16 April 2019 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <danwing@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0782E12064C; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DsgxZRsBNs6P; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B52BD12063F; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id t16so10575165plo.0; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5g1vDyqkgAFx0jwQTaoPZfbokLelI5Ub8yULBSkIaTg=; b=VBNuqGV9GSBEK7lGOPbaQpRlnpI4/P6WXlzhHiQ3akjZKdrOFBLzCyv/ZqRnOq6Bvd pk39hEY+AmUaum/49uhUNP8q1ZnHNbh5onSyG0+Eh7rGkH1vVrUCIodsZ1MEMlDIvGWw BZBoZcJOwVx0qPdhOFyWVBzfZ3VQ85KV829+B/KPniTo8Hrm/EPsaC+jQo2D2+tAgSlh GHGYmza22cq3FMi3KKpkiiX20E6M/yWvMvoHy905rrPKHjew8HPCDML/LH8yGnwsOCtD yubpWEfdbs9LU13DbjID6k5W51f+duVm+bimyceNA1JI+7h3RWMlVOJ2K1G4KYki7XXB L8Xw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=5g1vDyqkgAFx0jwQTaoPZfbokLelI5Ub8yULBSkIaTg=; b=eg8We0NI+vrKV9aALu9nhBtC/L0eYNKiHW4iKcdeAMnxb0fFhdqFOl3bVTXEzJafu+ QpVOeVexuhy/xIQf7DkdpBXS8OTnhWj6bb06w3kcPDkPshuyga3yN+Of7nID+Tl2PYcX iQMy2DBzmsMgku1KkVMZ1BseiztqjdF4wc0WtvRB/pZ2MzDSztkvFeRIcL/pip8YDi2O wl0NOoNLc0rn0rSlqSShAI6YfJb+9Ksic2mzAEjRDu7hm49G9wHDDSBehXUvdFQsLrsJ XHbptO0SmZm8fEEHcueOVtCmTMoVqx4HtWl93tQk2j9e0kVq7294s3+x7eZeJxFk6Wt1 7ysw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9w0V3YjE8KC5EO9KjTOlzDglFeOxv2wucROynvlBrQ1cQvMlZ c8floNp4zlHKzBKFH2uz7PE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzVpre4fE9LdrIGYn6D0/z9ffo6I3b88jlK6ks37VR8rtISt6hyb3t2vVRCrFrt9lgDA4HUgQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:4681:: with SMTP id p1mr82508312pld.42.1555430896456; Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjcldanwi.lan ([75.111.84.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n21sm102320740pfb.42.2019.04.16.09.08.15 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
From: Dan Wing <danwing@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA60D56@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:08:14 -0700
Cc: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, "dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, "kaduk@mit.edu" <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1446492F-E573-48AA-9355-88647CF4FF5C@gmail.com>
References: <023e01d4ee1f$c3892950$4a9b7bf0$@smyslov.net> <D6EE3667-C4E6-4F68-A9A5-E8F0744C0972@gmail.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302EA60D56@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/ZxYlyR7oRXBjzN5qbtUOyZWFDXQ>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:22:57 -0000

Thanks.
-d


> On Apr 16, 2019, at 1:40 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Dan, 
> 
> Thank you for the comment. 
> 
> Some of the text is provided as a reminder to ease the readability of the document, while some (new) text (e.g., "Note that both 'immediate' and 'activate-when-mitigating' have an immediate effect when a mitigation request is being processed by the DOTS server.") is specific to the signal channel. 
> 
> A first attempt to tweak the text and avoid the potential confusion you raised is available at: 
> 
> https://github.com/boucadair/filter-control/blob/master/wdiff%20draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06.txt%20draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06.pdf 
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Dan Wing
>> Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2019 20:05
>> À : Valery Smyslov
>> Cc : dots-chairs@ietf.org; dots@ietf.org; kaduk@mit.edu
>> Objet : Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-
>> filtering-06
>> 
>> I support adoption of this draft.
>> 
>> Nit: I am nervous it is unnecessarily re-stating normative behavior in its
>> Section 3.2.1 -- normative behavior of acl-name and activation-type which
>> should only be located in draft-ietf-dots-data-channel.  It's difficult to
>> tell if the subtle word differences are intended to change behavior or simply
>> restate the behavior described in draft-ietf-dots-data-channel.  I would just
>> remove the text that mimics draft-ietf-dots-data-channel and simply point off
>> to draft-ietf-dots-data-channel.
>> 
>> -d
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 8, 2019, at 8:28 AM, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> the chairs recently received an adoption request for draft-nishizuka-dots-
>> signal-control-filtering-06.
>>> 
>>> This message starts a two-week adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-
>> signal-control-filtering-06.
>>> The call ends up on Tuesday, April the 23rd.
>>> 
>>> Please send your opinion regarding adoption of this document to the list
>> before this date.
>>> If you think the draft should be adopted, please indicate whether you're
>> willing
>>> to review it/to work on it. If you think the draft should not be adopted,
>> please explain why.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Frank & Valery.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dots mailing list
>>> Dots@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dots mailing list
>> Dots@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email