Re: [Dots] Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance check

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Wed, 09 January 2019 17:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D79130FA0 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:54:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6WhWtns6Mia for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59421130F99 for <dots@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:54:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x09Hsgkd021106; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:54:42 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu x09Hsgkd021106
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1547056482; bh=2V5oeCcpoCk3UEzopLRgMqqYc9LcATge2zfxOxJoBvw=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:From; b=EMdN2mZCBTYJlkoSp6XijEFLK4EpbNXvtCUfLktzgMnBdnu2L2frqd8om8g5wuqvZ 0NL+PqsCi6aUXNanRwZkYXxs5bey3Mm/ihUTpO0itghYoOiBJNfTbakpHF/4nTOsLm BHEIbbzvRer+ed09E384GE4M7Yc4tGTsfuldfP50=
Received: from CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cascade.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.248]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id x09HseXh018647; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:54:40 -0500
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASCADE.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.248]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 12:54:39 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
CC: "nteague@verisign.com" <nteague@verisign.com>, "rgm@labs.htt-consult.com" <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>, "stefan.fouant@copperriverit.com" <stefan.fouant@copperriverit.com>
Thread-Topic: Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance check
Thread-Index: AdRvqmd7N9ly1zhyRTeZI8TDkhu8jQ4mEeHw
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 17:54:39 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC0184C73340@marathon>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/_bSL7e_eK9Uws3IGohAUZT-G-o8>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance check
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:54:54 -0000

Hello!

I'm inquiring again on the IPR check as document shepherd.  

Nik/Bob/Stefan: Could you please reply to the IPR check thread started at:

https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02711.html

All authors: this draft is about to expire.  Could it please be resubmitted as -17 before that happens.

Thanks,
Roman

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roman Danyliw
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 1:12 PM
> To: dots@ietf.org
> Cc: 'nteague@verisign.com'; <nteague@verisign.com>;; 'rgm@labs.htt-
> consult.com' <rgm@labs.htt-consult.com>;;
> 'stefan.fouant@copperriverit.com'; <stefan.fouant@copperriverit.com>;
> Subject: Publication of draft-ietf-dots-use-cases requires IPR conformance
> check
> 
> Hello!
> 
> The use case draft (draft-ietf-dots-use-cases-16) is ready for publication but
> is awaiting a shepherd write-up.  As the document shepherd, I need help
> from this draft's authors to complete the write-up as was noted in [1].
> Specifically, I need to assert that that the IPR issues per BCP 78/79  have been
> filed.
> 
> Daniel helpfully started a thread of public assertions on IPR from the authors:
> ** Daniel Migault: https://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/dots/current/msg02707.html
> ** Frank Xialiang: https://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/dots/current/msg02708.html
> ** Roland Dobbins: https://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/dots/current/msg02710.html
> ** Kaname Nishizuka: https://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/dots/current/msg02711.html
> 
> A response is still needed from Stefan Fouant, Nik Teague and Robert
> Moskowitz.
> 
> Stefan/Nik/Bob: can you please respond to Daniel's thread on IPR.
> 
> Thanks,
> Roman
> 
> [1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dots/current/msg02715.html