[Dots] Hi, authors. 3 comments:

"Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 06:26 UTC

Return-Path: <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3610130FD0; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:26:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yhFCyTzAHIAH; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:26:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0E62130FAB; Mon, 4 Mar 2019 22:26:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 1396A1A1AB61E5647278; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 06:26:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 06:26:21 +0000
Received: from lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1591.10; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 06:26:21 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.209) by lhreml703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.52) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1591.10 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 06:26:21 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM511-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.215]) by DGGEMM401-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.209]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 14:26:15 +0800
From: "Xialiang (Frank, Network Standard & Patent Dept)" <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>
To: "draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering.authors@ietf.org" <draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering.authors@ietf.org>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Hi, authors. 3 comments:
Thread-Index: AdTTG1tETE/2KpxERZ6OuyfVBRtPrg==
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 06:26:14 +0000
Message-ID: <C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12C9D756B@dggemm511-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.159.76]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_C02846B1344F344EB4FAA6FA7AF481F12C9D756Bdggemm511mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/ae1xB9mRz1REEXYb4VUJkH7-xQk>
Subject: [Dots] Hi, authors. 3 comments:
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 06:26:32 -0000

Hi authors,
I have 3 general comments as below:

1.       Can you clarify the DOTS server administrative domain a little bit? What is the goal we define it?



2.       Will this document open a door to make signal channel to cover the functions of data channel more and more?



3.       I can accept the situation of changing the accept-list to the "deactivate" status, but is it a common use case we need to change a deny-list to the "immediate" status?


Thanks!


B.R.
Frank