Re: [Dots] Target-Attack-type expansion: more discussion

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Mon, 06 May 2019 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403B5120144 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 04:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id geEYoBBEfgUm for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 May 2019 04:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc2d.google.com (mail-yw1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFB37120077 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 May 2019 04:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id s5so3427123ywd.9 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 May 2019 04:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mrWVsY/+0mWtlyf6lgijcSdV2rgR8nR+8SuBxcLZ0S8=; b=HCiUQT2dJLD1L44V0vHbaPjpZutfG9SbBo2BitTfKpdEPnYwQ/f/XOUGpAWuB8oA4J Gxuuv95IXz/fi7A5KjCT6BBzmztdlzyO/k3/ny/BxSZGEqmhbwK99nz1JN1rUpnMdg21 Iko5MsRPC1Zg44vwyCdSKdI7motLh6UH3ZPp7eBC0HZ3k0gQ0rdD+N3aCYTZxcqDn1RK IpQa7J22e8rC8yWyuuqjGKo2HoWbfl1bL7WLGPf+VVLJgJevQMQK/eE+R3z/Y+dnqOIB +yt5wmt9ZBFa2C7eM7S/0MWU98m+3S68SDdRin5wRhCD+nDlILJDUBXZhLMkBZNBafBZ QgMA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mrWVsY/+0mWtlyf6lgijcSdV2rgR8nR+8SuBxcLZ0S8=; b=KF45M683blmlydvIrozEu64rEmtDpIanURE/lsS4IVp+yKidKtJLQ+sGZgAsegI3CD prCMDc4SjBs4svRxh1t4zuQFkNRMIQVMcXqwB6riNlWc20c0o0NIsr8FQlXufoZ7+WII 4WU7gYVPSz/mSUPx27Blxwi1euAX2SHYl5up21drED+O0MCm6/IDC1fmeRf4BaTuQewC 7Mmcxa4SmriMKyZMlF0e4VVjL+QIpVz0Zz/ecg6Bw2SqkURXjhJ98CiSQeEQN1SOSsxb OK8jKt0wu8Ov4X2H59IQIsMFuiPPKfNbv781DVnAutMy5DCgSS5Wz26VPHgszvfqgEgr Bcpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUrqZ9JcTz+udRHPI2u13d2zyxjPX6zA33anp7m21n8vk8YCnL+ DfZwA24Si3I0ypx0byWOpYfWTTBxSnf8zu7Sdzs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwQ7fcAPGqxEXAIsqpD31Na5cL5/V7sGC+zvEaMR01Gg3PGh5ukIFopkEbLdOYVDagRUzuzB+ilHqxayOT+mtc=
X-Received: by 2002:a81:ac46:: with SMTP id z6mr3603910ywj.255.1557140633785; Mon, 06 May 2019 04:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <2afa5c9df0626fd-00007.Richmail.00004070460264152429@chinamobile.com> <CALZ3u+YTx2b=QMTM_UzgX254cgcgAWYxnwA=-VwHhD03ygragw@mail.gmail.com> <2019050616564984104217@chinamobile.com> <CALZ3u+Y43hR-CkyD6sjziiJEi3TVHJ7mNEgmUS-GpLGow8jxew@mail.gmail.com> <2019050618104036747536@chinamobile.com> <CALZ3u+b=RVT11dwN=2dHE9q6i6BCscs2PQmnygvBLPYy5QHqPA@mail.gmail.com> <F_U6GM3POUZ8TzoLKG37aO51HRo18XoifZME_ETIGh9LsF_6wC68n4y-dcHHmxNDKPk55FOaNG2cGRdJ3MV2om9m-1fhL9y7P_-Ln4x128k=@0x46.uk>
In-Reply-To: <F_U6GM3POUZ8TzoLKG37aO51HRo18XoifZME_ETIGh9LsF_6wC68n4y-dcHHmxNDKPk55FOaNG2cGRdJ3MV2om9m-1fhL9y7P_-Ln4x128k=@0x46.uk>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 14:03:28 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+bfFEb-oS7Nk8RtvV=rnAjySzyP_bdyfEuGXxiXE5kM4Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nik Teague <nik-ietf@0x46.uk>
Cc: =?UTF-8?B?6ZmI576O546y?= <chenmeiling@chinamobile.com>, dots <dots@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/bCZTObSIr7wmfK4-je55uwmKfHI>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Target-Attack-type expansion: more discussion
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 11:03:56 -0000

> Layers have no real relevance... Using the memcached
> example - the exploitation may be at the application but
> the mitigation could easily be handled by a standard ACL.

Exactly my point.

Understanding which layers are affected in the network during a
complex DDoS incident could help to speed up the mitigation procedure,
but never more than that.

--
Töma