IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dots] IPR confirmation for draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-02

Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net> Thu, 10 February 2022 07:17 UTC

Return-Path: <valery@smyslov.net>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7154D3A14E8; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:17:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=smyslov.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Kg6p_kWUwG5U; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5D63A14E4; Wed, 9 Feb 2022 23:16:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smyslov.net ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID :Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=VBTKGgZcuroPLoP4xuoamKEfY7vhuudhplbdUssxGt8=; b=yj5YSt98MKJPayc4rjVLh1OFYw o8W2NtitLLEAxni0NyE9bOYixYXxIpve/xAl2915PlwWyYOVUpRBkUA7pCPPQ0qH4hwQxWtKBHAkM umYqNy29WokFAEK4S2f6iyolBEjki8zF5f3lq+dGwznZQboQ+ljsTT35l8OQi60eiRw5m018spxRo N52Q6CDaQ/25P1YuKQg5jvBR8acTK3vpFUrUl2OgnII2HjDwvcTUILBZt8oUwcj0DCNtkfo91bCJt qsMgU/BQr1L84E7WrgN0eMGdonxNkNebtjHo9cZfevURfln957TdJLJ6zkmqUhO0bCzYHhDh3+Lid U2b6XffQ==;
Received: from [93.188.44.204] (port=65415 helo=buildpc) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_DHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <valery@smyslov.net>) id 1nI3hH-0007PC-HN; Thu, 10 Feb 2022 02:16:55 -0500
From: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
To: draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org
Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:16:55 +0300
Message-ID: <18e601d81e4e$30dde340$9299a9c0$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdgeTZdJKMAE/2ErSouN7hUt+Gnn2w==
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/bHORwec2q3mZUkEHvhZS1R7u8kQ>
Subject: [Dots] IPR confirmation for draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-02
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 07:17:04 -0000

Hi authors,

while preparing shepherd write-up for draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-02, 
in accordance with BCP78 and BCP79 I have to ask all authors and contributors 
whether they are aware of any IPR regarding this document.
Can you please confirm that you are not aware of any IPR 
or disclose any IPR you are aware of that are concerned with this draft.

I'd also like to ask authors about implementation status of the draft.
Are there any implementations that follow recommendations from the draft 
you are aware of?

Regards,
Valery.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email