IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Dots] [IANA #1364390] [Errata Verified] RFC9132 (7058)

David Dong via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org> Fri, 28 June 2024 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CD4C14F5F7; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.654
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.654 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jtUXpjCE1nae; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5F8C14F5F6; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 17:44:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request6.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D7E16F9; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request6.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 863D752E75; Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:44:47 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: david.dong
From: David Dong via RT <iana-matrix@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <20240506172426.BE3371996062@rfcpa.amsl.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-1364390@icann.org> <20240506172426.BE3371996062@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <rt-5.0.3-355426-1719535487-909.1364390-37-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1364390
X-Managed-BY: RT 5.0.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: david.dong@iana.org
To: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 00:44:47 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID-Hash: XGMADKE7QRA4VSCKDSEBQD6MEIOT2WAX
X-Message-ID-Hash: XGMADKE7QRA4VSCKDSEBQD6MEIOT2WAX
X-MailFrom: iana-shared@icann.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dots.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, kondtir@gmail.com, jlindbla@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, iana@iana.org, dots@ietf.org, debcooley1@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: iana-matrix@iana.org
Subject: [Dots] [IANA #1364390] [Errata Verified] RFC9132 (7058)
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/bPgKxdupGxYpCbve1st-z4B6dh0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dots-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dots-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dots-leave@ietf.org>

Hi all,

Apologies for the delay in following up for this errata; it appears that this errata affects ietf-dots-signal-channel@2021-09-02.yang. As this is an IETF YANG module, would you be able to submit an errata against RFC 8782?

Thank you.

Best regards,

David Dong
IANA Services Sr. Specialist

On Mon May 06 17:24:50 2024, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote:
> The following errata report has been verified for RFC9132,
>  "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal
> Channel Specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7058
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Status: Verified
> Type: Technical
> 
> Reported by: Jan Lindblad <jlindbla@cisco.com>
> Date Reported: 2022-07-29
> Verified by: Deb Cooley (IESG)
> 
> Section: 5.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> uses data-channel:target {
>   when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/"
>      + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'";
> }
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> uses data-channel:target {
>   when "../conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'";
> }
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The original YANG statements make the "uses" statement apply to all
> "list scope" instances as soon as there is at least one "scope"
> instance that has "conflict-cause" set to "overlapping-targets". I
> suspect this is not the author's intent.
> 
> The corrected YANG statements make the "uses" statement only apply to
> the specific "scope" instances that have "conflict-cause" set to
> "overlapping-targets". There are also other ways to fix this issue.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat
> Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification
> Publication Date    : September 2021
> Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : DDoS Open Threat Signaling
> Stream              : IETF

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status