Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)
Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com> Mon, 29 April 2024 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E24C180B7E for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TiBhNEhY3V32 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E258C1840CC for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36982425C26B; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d9HzraC6RhyQ; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:937:3520:eee:e00e] (unknown [IPv6:2601:641:300:5fb0:937:3520:eee:e00e]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04016424B427; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Rebecca VanRheenen <rvanrheenen@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240429075030.3C99C120E86@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:43:15 -0700
Cc: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com, kondtir@gmail.com, valery@smyslov.net, frank.xialiang@huawei.com, dots@ietf.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <724B2890-B198-4D19-820C-00D08BC5037A@amsl.com>
References: <20240429075030.3C99C120E86@rfcpa.amsl.com>
To: Deb Cooley <debcooley1@gmail.com>, Paul Wouters <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/bVhQcu78R8-SGqNPXGXmsQs6PAA>
Subject: Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 17:43:21 -0000
Hi Paul and Deb, Because the dots WG has concluded, we are sending this to both of you as ADs of the Security Area. We note that this errata report and EID #7058 (also in Reported state) address the same text in Section 5.3 but have different suggestions for corrected text. Please keep this in mind when you review. https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7911 https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7058 Thank you, RFC Editor/rv > On Apr 29, 2024, at 12:50 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9132, > "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7911 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Technical > Reported by: Wolf mark <c72768341@gmail.com> > > Section: GLOBAL > > Original Text > ------------- > uses data-channel:target { > when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/" > + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'"; > } > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Uses data+channel:claim > If "/signal-information=conflict > > Notes > ----- > Original text is outdated in the technical base > > Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the systematic technical decorum > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08) > -------------------------------------- > Title : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification > Publication Date : September 2021 > Author(s) : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : DDoS Open Threat Signaling > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG >
- Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7… Rebecca VanRheenen
- Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7… Carine
- [Dots] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7… Deb Cooley