[Dots] prefix with namespace identifier in draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 24 February 2020 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49AF3A086E for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:17:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=orange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o_jjC_-bQO2I for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.66.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C3E3A086D for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 00:17:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfedar01.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by opfedar21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48Qw072Nnwz7tZ9; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:17:11 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orange.com; s=ORANGE001; t=1582532231; bh=mItFNuxWeBK9YTYza3bl4VEFCVtxbE5AgiTIJvAQYak=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=o8Wew1NM6vyFX7zDFYdBqoyITDekXyPbIzQTgwnGBIf8JiSkkPb7IPv3Vk70+OdBD 9gOFjgBYR4tFs9UEIx9MXQkHG34OTzg9e+ZLs0wXrNpBusgecBMhNkQBLXbHF3viE9 I28lyqLoLYaCAXhI2CleS6QSNTkdsFM679bXWYZScElotpJmtrN/CgTLMzSEyiTrNH Cu9Q+eMkxbIVAbscvj51BHy64TodhDkZC0lURIQpQGvJdPzMssU66XgOQ7pu+9DMe7 xS4UiZC80qWBsKT9lwR4jlu6R+aSJo8dUAu0aYwFA2BSqVzf3HA7iptkDgY9dCVAAU l+pAnfQ4FMPtQ==
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.35]) by opfedar01.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 48Qw071BrHzBrM6; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:17:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM6C.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:17:10 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Jon Shallow <supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com>, "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@mcafee.com>, kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: prefix with namespace identifier in draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control
Thread-Index: AdXq6s5ptufAkTb0RYWD/FCAL3pHlw==
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:17:10 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303143E803@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303143E803OPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/d7VlMl-d_Gwr4EIsQk7FgFOQfxY>
Subject: [Dots] prefix with namespace identifier in draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:17:15 -0000

Re-,

The prefix use in draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-02#section-5.1 is correct given that acl-* attributes are not defined in the base YANG module as being part of a mitigation request.

We assumed that the same key value is used for both (e.g., acl-name and ietf-dots-signal-control:acl-name). Given that we revisited that design in the telemetry I-D, I'm afraid that we will need to assign key values for ietf-dots-signal-control:acl-list and ietf-dots-signal-control:acl-name.
Cheers,
Med

De : Jon Shallow [mailto:supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com]
Envoyé : vendredi 21 février 2020 16:46
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN; Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy; kaname nishizuka; dots@ietf.org
Objet : RE: [Dots] DOTS telemetry questions

Hi,

See inline Jon1>

Regards

Jon



Jon> We  have the same naming issues in draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-00 where we do not have the ietf-dots-signal-control: prefix in the JSON examples (Fig 10)

[Med] Fig 10 is a "normal" mitigation request. Why should it need to include "ietf-dots-signal-control:" prefix?


Jon1> My bad - I was looking at draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-00, not draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-02.  However, https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-02#section-5.1 only defines "activation-type" without the prefix, and acl-list and acl-name have the incorrect prefix: added to, for example, Figure 1.