IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Shepherd feedback on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-21

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Fri, 28 September 2018 13:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A96124D68 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tqLIlTOEGjVM for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taper.sei.cmu.edu (taper.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06FBA124BE5 for <dots@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 06:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from delp.sei.cmu.edu (delp.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.31]) by taper.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w8SD7Xrk014564; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:07:33 -0400
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 taper.sei.cmu.edu w8SD7Xrk014564
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1538140053; bh=qRiN6m0ZJ6AXGo8qd1qv+9uwyrhxqb6H+ylUYxyYpGI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=UfA1CVeyNt5CmsEwVLTTfz2RFb9Bwn5qNVoXqXXEqLP4HkW7BF7JPKaSY83PBIrNV BRWEenyEnhPfB0KB5hRAwp3DWpUPY+HW4Iuwji65UJNluapg6Kj/5NqhRF5mQSIjVT QXRwVdBwUhdktMqbTx6Nm1r6Pj2qMeIN5NsRmCF4=
Received: from CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu (cassina.ad.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.28.249]) by delp.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id w8SD7TPL009357; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:07:29 -0400
Received: from MARATHON.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.250]) by CASSINA.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([10.64.28.249]) with mapi id 14.03.0399.000; Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:07:29 -0400
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: "mohamed.boucadair@orange.com" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Shepherd feedback on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-21
Thread-Index: AdRV19jHE2e2qdMcQo+LZPRf9LNaNgASazRAAEGkosA=
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:07:28 +0000
Message-ID: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C45838F@marathon>
References: <359EC4B99E040048A7131E0F4E113AFC014C45627E@marathon> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE769C@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFE769C@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.22.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/eF2zzimwPO87txeyqUjx29MZgvk>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Shepherd feedback on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-21
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:07:36 -0000

Hi Med!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2018 1:37 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>; dots@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Dots] Shepherd feedback on draft-ietf-dots-data-channel-21
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> The diagrams were generated using a command which allows to break long
> lines. This is why you can see in the draft, e.g.,
> 
>        |              |     |     |           +--:(range)
>        |              |     |     |           |  +--rw lower-port
>        |              |     |     |           |  |       inet:port-number
>        |              |     |     |           |  +--rw upper-port
>        |              |     |     |           |          inet:port-number
>        |              |     |     |           +--:(operator)
>        |              |     |     |              +--rw operator?
>        |              |     |     |              |       operator
>        |              |     |     |              +--rw port
>        |              |     |     |                      inet:port-number
> 
> 
> For the nits you reported, I have already tried both commands:
> 
> pyang -f tree --tree-line-length 69 ...
> 
> and
> 
> pyang -f tree --tree-line-length 50 ...
> 
> but with the same result.
> 
> I suggest to leave this to be fixed by the RFC editor.

Thanks for making the changes in -22 to clean this up.

Roman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email