[Dots] Role reversal in RFC7252

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Fri, 08 November 2019 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAE2120086 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 04:29:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mfewphe4DG92 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 04:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-inet.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1808712007C for <dots@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 04:29:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 478fj30x3Zz4wY7; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:29:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme6.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.13.76]) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 478fj301BzzDq8P; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:29:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e878:bd0:c89e:5b42]) by OPEXCAUBM7E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::54f9:a664:e400:452a%21]) with mapi id 14.03.0468.000; Fri, 8 Nov 2019 13:29:26 +0100
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
To: "Carsten Bormann (cabo@tzi.org)" <cabo@tzi.org>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Role reversal in RFC7252
Thread-Index: AdWWMCYu7mRjeWKMSre161Y2+4DxBQ==
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 12:29:25 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303135F7FE@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.114.13.247]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93303135F7FEOPEXCAUBMA2corp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/ebM5K5AptX_AjNpZUJz2EA8QqKI>
Subject: [Dots] Role reversal in RFC7252
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2019 12:29:30 -0000

Hi Carsten,


Can you please help indicate whether (and thus which part of) RFC7252 discusses client/server role reversal so that a CoAP server can send (non-Empty) requests to a CoAP client?

Thank you.

Cheers,
Med