[Dots] [Errata Rejected] RFC9132 (7911)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 06 May 2024 17:21 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4C7C151068; Mon, 6 May 2024 10:21:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yd3KGqdFWDZF; Mon, 6 May 2024 10:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfcpa.amsl.com [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 931AEC14F604; Mon, 6 May 2024 10:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 754FF1A6619C; Mon, 6 May 2024 10:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
To: c72768341@gmail.com, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com, kondtir@gmail.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240506172119.754FF1A6619C@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 10:21:19 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: O2KR7XBRKFILNRF4LPZAAAXIXW2O6JXY
X-Message-ID-Hash: O2KR7XBRKFILNRF4LPZAAAXIXW2O6JXY
X-MailFrom: wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dots.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: debcooley1@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, dots@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Dots] [Errata Rejected] RFC9132 (7911)
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/gXc0Wp7jnJdjhsMWUuYRL1uyI0k>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dots-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dots-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dots-leave@ietf.org>
The following errata report has been rejected for RFC9132, "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7911 -------------------------------------- Status: Rejected Type: Technical Reported by: Wolf mark <c72768341@gmail.com> Date Reported: 2024-04-29 Rejected by: Deb Cooley (IESG) Section: 5.3 Original Text ------------- uses data-channel:target { when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/" + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'"; } Corrected Text -------------- Uses data+channel:claim If "/signal-information=conflict Notes ----- Original text is outdated in the technical base Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the systematic technical decorum --VERIFIER NOTES-- Incorrect -------------------------------------- RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08) -------------------------------------- Title : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification Publication Date : September 2021 Author(s) : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : DDoS Open Threat Signaling Stream : IETF
- [Dots] [Errata Rejected] RFC9132 (7911) RFC Errata System