IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06

"Valery Smyslov" <valery@smyslov.net> Wed, 24 April 2019 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <valery@smyslov.net>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC671202FD; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wlsAWHj6qlL0; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from direct.host-care.com (direct.host-care.com [198.136.54.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87ABA120154; Tue, 23 Apr 2019 22:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [185.48.36.5] (port=58515 helo=svannotebook) by direct.host-care.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <valery@smyslov.net>) id 1hJA4p-0007Qh-CA; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 01:04:11 -0400
From: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
To: dots@ietf.org
Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org, kaduk@mit.edu
References: <023e01d4ee1f$c3892950$4a9b7bf0$@smyslov.net>
In-Reply-To: <023e01d4ee1f$c3892950$4a9b7bf0$@smyslov.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:04:08 +0300
Message-ID: <019101d4fa5b$2702cd50$750867f0$@smyslov.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQFofcDll063hnoOZ5xJUu1PCD2lGacjui6g
Content-Language: ru
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - direct.host-care.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - smyslov.net
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: direct.host-care.com: authenticated_id: valery@smyslov.net
X-Authenticated-Sender: direct.host-care.com: valery@smyslov.net
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/hthQOrSGB_x-OIMrxqDmYASxsE8>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Adoption call for draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-control-filtering-06
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 05:04:15 -0000

Hi,

we received a lot of replies supporting adoption of the document.
So, the document is adopted. Authors, please re-submit it as WG draft.

One comment.
The draft uses few times a keyword "MAY NOT". This combination is not
among the list of RFC requirement keywords (it is not listed neither
in RFC2119, nor in RFC8174). If the intent was to use RFC requirement
language, then I'd suggest replacing it with one of MUST NOT, SHALL NOT,
SHOULD NOT. Otherwise please make it lowcase.

Regards,
Valery.

> Hi all,
> 
> the chairs recently received an adoption request for draft-nishizuka-dots-
> signal-control-filtering-06.
> 
> This message starts a two-week adoption call for
draft-nishizuka-dots-signal-
> control-filtering-06.
> The call ends up on Tuesday, April the 23rd.
> 
> Please send your opinion regarding adoption of this document to the list
> before this date.
> If you think the draft should be adopted, please indicate whether you're
willing
> to review it/to work on it. If you think the draft should not be adopted,
please
> explain why.
> 
> Regards,
> Frank & Valery.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email