Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)

Carine <c72768341@gmail.com> Mon, 29 April 2024 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <c72768341@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FD6C14F604 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:51:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.845
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.845 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y82ALJYuh0cp for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb34.google.com (mail-yb1-xb34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A588C14F5EA for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb34.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-de59d7f2928so3620624276.3 for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1714377109; x=1714981909; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Y+hXnqMacUb+PJR9hirY+aKhtDWTAnAoV7OZvPsVL7E=; b=O1jvovKBMF/m97XRr8uXsW444rNt8ujtG0uHSf+fitvN3aaklFSHzbyHJNXU1fhnbc upefJZVVIzK61K4vhRSvimiY6RM+07ApqzM604I9ePiMiaaFWFN6SU+QMtABsDm/YJEb UtYWZfZf5BPHKXAXHKgJZOvsJkSNMwzBl2nSkdBAbdT7FnaU6XORrf93BLpy3QQcuW4+ n/gqO+DFsHquVEVmv8za+lL6LvcL+mM82wZmNEx89tVVNFplvnIgSPY7otjtFjsRVafI 0VFf4A2y3oDyuHINey8s4ittZCR91wPWH5AJoXsTht2JcsRQ0E39PGokOR5s8wh5+8dK fVQQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1714377109; x=1714981909; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Y+hXnqMacUb+PJR9hirY+aKhtDWTAnAoV7OZvPsVL7E=; b=tY9EK0QeoHpMQda8d2YhNYFcQPujL3PjpAgSHEx5cLd0oZ1wENDS7V5QiAZktKQvQn L6MNX/YVNt23xqq87pRqosRKGJ2/rv3gSlCDYlxGPzQIfclQstE2Ig+jLISKstmA12e6 wN0IPfYF1t4+ZcIY1Oej2TXnjAZ9Zji9UtPM8YKRwYqJcG0ihYkCdpgc2hP99EIcf0Ai x8Ezo8z3sHQz8cmObeC2dq5zhKJDvHLdPJ2dvrPTPh4zSJFCS/djTPDb70+x9TEnNCti szTKOTBIW8WmA49dJVoHHFgSDS0n153rY1bDFQGLZ78Gm3/SiF1ak1NN2R/Ch8hyBobZ nGMg==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXvebWVnshdR2PbB8NLVgI1weAQEjgZcsgKm57qUTS26YFffzN9vkJ/YiwEFDMMxMZii1K+aa34Q61vHerU
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwthSw1V7z/4t/QY0meQHlN8AyUIe+3+50LJbKHiG2i45QBe2+P N3W91vxARI6z0goyVI1rSx4gak+OwXBU2BGnkqN2PbmlwrPOkYIPRWiCDKoLOlw3+CmDq/XKgrv d9uQKzU3JiV4qqjhaNL/ILGVwJ5w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGm7ZEADuVlcw3FVChr3nJKN2mh52GVwl1cI8GrMdErZSkdBCGnI1P/xnVxtI3wLw2zHmicVLtxHBean63doos=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:64f:0:b0:dc2:466a:23bd with SMTP id o15-20020a5b064f000000b00dc2466a23bdmr7566698ybq.54.1714377109337; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 00:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20240429075030.3C99C120E86@rfcpa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20240429075030.3C99C120E86@rfcpa.amsl.com>
From: Carine <c72768341@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 08:51:36 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPMAXUOyPL7SkJfZ_pyxk9vfP_+MqT98tKU3x2whhg+vbDAs=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com, tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>, debcooley1@gmail.com, paul.wouters@aiven.io, valery@smyslov.net, frank.xialiang@huawei.com, dots@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009cff3a0617378690"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/iVXpIUMhAdks9ioxzeeiMBQRf7Q>
Subject: Re: [Dots] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:54:20 -0000

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024, 08:50 RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9132,
> "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel
> Specification".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7911
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Wolf mark <c72768341@gmail.com>
>
> Section: GLOBAL
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> uses data-channel:target {
>                 when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/"
>                    + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'";
>               }
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Uses data+channel:claim
>              If "/signal-information=conflict
>
> Notes
> -----
> Original text is outdated in the technical base
>
> Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the systematic technical
> decorum
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it
> will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
> will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling
> (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification
> Publication Date    : September 2021
> Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : DDoS Open Threat Signaling
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>