Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com Mon, 27 March 2023 15:35 UTC
Return-Path: <jon.shallow@jpshallow.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5596C1782B0 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gC1oKVivcPR6 for <dots@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.jpshallow.com (mail.jpshallow.com [31.22.13.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DD0C1782AC for <dots@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 08:35:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.78] (helo=N01332) by mail.jpshallow.com with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <jon.shallow@jpshallow.com>) id 1pgosI-0005Cj-1o; Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:35:10 +0100
From: supjps-ietf@jpshallow.com
To: dots@ietf.org, Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org, 'Paul Wouters' <paul.wouters@aiven.io>
References: <054c01d960bc$255a8df0$700fa9d0$@smyslov.net>
In-Reply-To: <054c01d960bc$255a8df0$700fa9d0$@smyslov.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 16:35:08 +0100
Message-ID: <012601d960c1$b6716660$23543320$@jpshallow.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQILNfFR3drARKwRqXLjzE80GbiYT66rFIuw
Content-Language: en-gb
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/ic-2wcg2035s-XV70PdLVWupv0Y>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS?
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:35:16 -0000
Hi all, I think the DOTS WG has run its natural course and can come to an end. Many thanks to all that have worked on DOTS - good to work with people who are clear thinkers, have good ideas and were prepared to check out the practical usability in the real (but aggressive!) world. I also will never stop being amazed at those for whom English was not their first language being able to sort out (as someone who is British and should know better) my incompressible grammar into something that made even better sense. Well done! Regards Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: Valery Smyslov [mailto: valery@smyslov.net] > Sent: 27 March 2023 15:55 > To: dots@ietf.org > Cc: dots-chairs@ietf.org; 'Paul Wouters' > Subject: [Dots] Closing DOTS? > > Hi, > > the DOTS WG has completed all its tasks according to the current charter > (the last WG draft - telemetry use cases is in the RFC Editor queue and > will hopefully be published soon). > > Additionally, we don't have any new discussion on the list for quite a long time > and we skipped 3 IETF meetings for this reason. > > The chairs discussed this with the responsible AD and we came to a conclusion > that it's time to close the group or recharter it if there is > an interest in more work items related to DOTS. > > So, our question to the WG - should the group be closed? > And if the answer is no, then what are new items > the WG can work on after its recharter? > > Regards, > Valery (for chairs) > > _______________________________________________ > Dots mailing list > Dots@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
- [Dots] Closing DOTS? Valery Smyslov
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? supjps-ietf
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? tirumal reddy
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? 陈美玲
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? Daniel Migault
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? Hayashi Yuhei
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? Ehud Doron
- Re: [Dots] Closing DOTS? Kaname Nishizuka
- [Dots] was RE: Closing DOTS? mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] was RE: Closing DOTS? supjps-ietf