Re: [Dots] Any reason why RFC8903 is stale since 09/20?

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C573A0CDD; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:59:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3OjH1kmjQzzw; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:59:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua1-x936.google.com (mail-ua1-x936.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::936]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC0BE3A0CDB; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua1-x936.google.com with SMTP id f29so9789019uab.0; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:59:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kcT2gtLgsHLIgoW0fhXiE6B0veZGAsn6bDY2KVougKU=; b=mgTx2OHY/p9uaFLDWua1Jhu7FgOnQ8BppAzXa1c77OrJgVgBfA3NqE1R9j5sffFnE7 vqgZ4CtCR/JM5Q9TuafqSQoKVbXn5SmIRZZFM7I4BgIsMVjHQP1krqBeu+WX9Wo9i4Ih cicT32iz8ex+TzrQrWSC+VW0oUzr5lLU3k9YZQ/FCneJTA4bmdnulhGQxoCiZHHY+F4i nAvuBD9PaOodJTuirXLwwsWdbLaNmo3WCXniYjv6UQ9ZS7MgaQ8xbWtN5dsnHijKj03U a3jcybTO9+4Tt4zzeoh0KUYuO19ofgEyosuadxB/prOv6AmFMG8kGCKOeoIDyQpuSUrq +3Fg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kcT2gtLgsHLIgoW0fhXiE6B0veZGAsn6bDY2KVougKU=; b=uOyL4tyPQBuLAoePrbCR1jmspz0bmbDRr+9J71E30SwcV2l6ek8dUMti8w7C7qV1rs FxPcIWNl6EQOkIvTWHT99zrwGPFZCidbbPAvRshgpQU1bXebcx5MWDeqAXhmnSquFqg1 SGIKRfZOfTRB3n+yPmIq5CkL+YNpkJfr+jPMKAyU1hYJzqoB5kUjNhsJNJ0NHaMAG8op SqnsDdZe7FQOAe5+rYROK9Q7gOUI6+zQLeoKfZDrVe6YFCRrbma+MY+8i1eGrebgi9Jf 44Z7DeR+Qz1xtk+OYDGyfkrJdf9j36xLuw2f5f9La9Jz5Epekmf6YhPR314IpoIgeu9N EtMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314yx9gcdN6G1XnDuMX1sKMg7VLqxOaFwOoSB6BvFBFq/v6317z TM6H9GHfteJxW8RVTkDQeGsfk9+9WlkO+huFzeg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw7+IPYeLUUn+L9vdgJvCxdqnNa58SHIsN7NnkqaXsdeBEKjj9P4MfzauSNo9NMe+hcH9WgaJSbEJMHQgD/c2g=
X-Received: by 2002:ab0:244f:: with SMTP id g15mr46232230uan.80.1609811979928; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 17:59:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5008_1609751917_5FF2DD6D_5008_29_10_787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B9330315A67BC@OPEXCAUBMA2.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <6d9bb032-dc51-1190-ad3d-729ed899e8b6@nttv6.jp>
In-Reply-To: <6d9bb032-dc51-1190-ad3d-729ed899e8b6@nttv6.jp>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 20:59:29 -0500
Message-ID: <CADZyTkmR_dyOYFT8fLG2d6nCjuQNM-kr-+W_-=8JJmvHZPQDFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp>
Cc: Mohamed Boucadair <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dots-use-cases@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-use-cases@ietf.org>, "Benjamin Kaduk (kaduk@mit.edu)" <kaduk@mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003809ca05b81d8f99"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/kyqOVE-S2M-zeOzzP4-qvIZIJWo>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Any reason why RFC8903 is stale since 09/20?
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 01:59:43 -0000

Hi,

Here is the complete status of the document:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc8903

Yours,
Daniel

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 8:42 PM kaname nishizuka <kaname@nttv6.jp> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Attached is the latest status.
> Yes, it's because some authors are not responding.
> I hope ADs will make it move forward.
>
> thanks,
> Kaname
>
> On 2021/01/04 18:18, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> This document is in AUTH48 for too long.
>
>
>
> It would be appreciated if the authors can share an update of the blocking
> issues, if any.
>
>
>
> If this is stale just because some authors didn’t reply, I guess this
> statement can be followed:
>
>
>
> https://ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/auth48/
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Med
>
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing listDots@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson