[Dots] Re: [IANA #1364390] [Errata Verified] RFC9132 (7058)

[Valery Smyslov <[e-mail]>]

Hi David,

[e-mail] is defined in RFC 9132, against which the errata was submitted.
RFC 8782 defines [e-mail] and, in any case, it is obsoleted by RFC 9132.
Can you please clarify what errata should be submitted against (obsoleted) RFC 8782?

Regards,
Valery.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Dong via RT <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Monday, July 15, 2024 11:52 PM
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: [Dots] [IANA #1364390] [Errata Verified] RFC9132 (7058)
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Following up on this; it appears that this errata affects ietf-dots-signal-
> [e-mail]. As this is an IETF YANG module, would you be able to
> submit an errata against RFC 8782?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> David Dong
> IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> 
> 
> On Fri Jun 28 00:44:47 2024, david.dong wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Apologies for the delay in following up for this errata; it appears
> > that this errata affects [e-mail]. As
> > this is an IETF YANG module, would you be able to submit an errata
> > against RFC 8782?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > David Dong
> > IANA Services Sr. Specialist
> >
> > On Mon May 06 17:24:50 2024, [e-mail] wrote:
> > > The following errata report has been verified for RFC9132,
> > > "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS) Signal
> > > Channel Specification".
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > You may review the report below and at:
> > > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7058
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Status: Verified
> > > Type: Technical
> > >
> > > Reported by: Jan Lindblad <[e-mail]> Date Reported:
> > > 2022-07-29 Verified by: Deb Cooley (IESG)
> > >
> > > Section: 5.3
> > >
> > > Original Text
> > > -------------
> > > uses data-channel:target {
> > >   when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/"
> > >      + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'"; }
> > >
> > >
> > > Corrected Text
> > > --------------
> > > uses data-channel:target {
> > >   when "../conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'";
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > > Notes
> > > -----
> > > The original YANG statements make the "uses" statement apply to all
> > > "list scope" instances as soon as there is at least one "scope"
> > > instance that has "conflict-cause" set to "overlapping-targets". I
> > > suspect this is not the author's intent.
> > >
> > > The corrected YANG statements make the "uses" statement only apply to
> > > the specific "scope" instances that have "conflict-cause" set to
> > > "overlapping-targets". There are also other ways to fix this issue.
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08)
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Title               : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat
> > > Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification
> > > Publication Date    : September 2021
> > > Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K
> > > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > > Source              : DDoS Open Threat Signaling
> > > Stream              : IETF
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]