[Dots] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-06: (with COMMENT)

[Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-signal-filter-control/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for responding to the SECDIR review (and thanks to Shawn Emery for
conducting the review).

** Is there a reason why the meta-data header in this document doesn’t note
this as an update to RFC8782 (especially since it is updating an operational
gap)?

** Minor editorial nits:
-- Section 4.1. Editorial.  s/Some time/Sometime/

-- Section 5.1. Recommend against hard-coding the IANA registry URL