Re: [Dots] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: (with COMMENT)

["Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Med,

Looks good to me.  Thanks for accommodating.

Rob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of
> [e-mail]
> Sent: 05 October 2022 13:50
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) <[e-mail]>; The IESG <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: RE: Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-
> 05: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Rob,
> 
> Thanks for the comment.
> 
> We do have the units indicated in Table 1, but it is better to repeat them in
> the text as well. Went with these changes:
> https://github.com/boucadair/draft-ietf-dots-robust-
> blocks/commit/1564de66b76e9c589406e2941e46d00abc34b30c
> 
> Cheers,
> Med
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Robert Wilton via Datatracker <[e-mail]>
> > Envoyé : mercredi 5 octobre 2022 13:51
> > À : The IESG <[e-mail]>
> > Cc : [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > Objet : Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-robust-
> > blocks-05: (with COMMENT)
> >
> > Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks-05: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to
> > all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to
> > cut this introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to
> > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-
> > positions/
> > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT
> > positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found
> > here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-robust-blocks/
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> > COMMENT:
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----
> >
> > HI,
> >
> > Thanks for this document.
> >
> > Only have a single, nit level, comment: When I was reading the
> > field
> > descriptions before the YANG modules, I was wondering what the
> > units were,
> > e.g., for the Dec64 values.  I noted that the units are specified
> > in the YANG
> > module, but possibly highlighting them in the earlier descriptions
> > would also
> > be helpful.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rob
> >
> >
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> __________________________________________________________
> _____
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
> message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
> this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.