Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Signal Draft

"Tobias Gondrom" <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> Wed, 13 June 2018 20:12 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gondrom.org; b=dKxsddyjd+dRRYnrAVBLiAOPDNJyMUjAw/k4NO6twsy3X/3h9hYZvHjcTh2b79cDgC16cq7vrZhUe4LtU8whN3Y28qcRShoa6gmyB4ID8fLucIasJjZU8R+Llqo+KJBM7LuYMsrtXyRuUPuEizAYPQmPiMrL/JZBgbesf+CaoJA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language;
From: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, dots@ietf.org
Cc: 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2018 22:12:33 +0200
Message-ID: <031b01d40352$dddbfb10$9993f130$@gondrom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_031C_01D40363.A167FF60"
Thread-Index: AdQDUsLAp631EdpPSQmlwKHhw54E9Q==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/uDUOWpqnnz87tojTXJ3SyMJ7IZA>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Signal Draft
Precedence: list

Apologies, I forgot to change the Subject line before sending. 

As this pertains to the Signal draft, now with corrected subject line. 

 

 

Hi guys, 

 

As far as I could see the signal draft WGLC can be closed and the raised
points have been addressed. 

(one caveat: I am still combing through the some left 10% of the email
threads for the signal draft to check whether I missed something, so if I
did, please let me know by raising it) 

 

As I understand that we had some further implementation works going on since
IETF101, I would like to reconfirm the question towards the implementation
and hackathon teams whether they found any further deviations or lack of
clarity in the last few weeks since IETF101? 

If not, then I think we are ready to go. I would appreciate a last thumbs
up or any raise issues if they encountered any in the last weeks. 

 

Thank a lot and best regards, Tobias

 

 

 

From: Dots <dots-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org> > On Behalf
Of mohamed.boucadair@orange.com <mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> 
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2018 10:15 AM
To: Tobias Gondrom <tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org
<mailto:tobias.gondrom@gondrom.org> >; dots@ietf.org <mailto:dots@ietf.org> 
Cc: 'Roman Danyliw' <rdd@cert.org <mailto:rdd@cert.org> >
Subject: Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft

 

Hi Tobias, 

 

Can you please update us about your conclusions with regards to the WGLC of
signal channel? 

 

Thank you. 

 

Cheers,

Med

 

De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Tobias Gondrom
Envoyé : vendredi 1 juin 2018 20:02
À : dots@ietf.org <mailto:dots@ietf.org> 
Cc : 'Roman Danyliw'
Objet : [Dots] Close of WGLC for Requirements Draft

 

Dear DOTS WG team, 

 

Thanks for your discussion and patience. 

As announced a month ago, the WGLC for the requirements document is now
closed. 

 

>From reading through all the emails on the mailing-list it appears to me
that all open issues have been addressed so far. In case I have missed
something, please let me know. 

 

Next step will be for the ID shepherd (Frank XiaLiang was so kind to
volunteer for the work task) and the chairs to prepare a shepherd document
and submit the document to the IESG for LC. 

 

Thanks and best regards, Tobias

 

 

Ps.: over the weekend, I will also review the status for the other WG
documents and come back to you on that beginning of next week.

Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Signal Draft kaname nishizuka
Re: [Dots] Close of WGLC for Signal Draft Tobias Gondrom