Re: [Dots] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 21 February 2019 17:25 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D8CB131010; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:25:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ldw9W4lzzweY; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F33C6131007; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 09:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.29] (cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x1LHPaQ4018357 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:25:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1550769939; bh=96jT6e5vCCUQTz4sDnlt9EKQYo3tTP3MCNVJBwM2z94=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=C8pTlT79kW0Ky2JGtIWkaGhqmglgN5WEa80eGhym5l/IzNd/x4QoKwzQmJ03gseUT 4IK7SXOQsTOBQUIkLjqRwWn8YdPCvOJRZwlk40gcb7KDy8AtpyHBOQ/228tmL7VQ8n WbycqtySJ5rA7KGi+gnYwlgbovRokgbt8qRgJOKQ=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-122-203-106.tx.res.rr.com [70.122.203.106] claimed to be [10.0.1.29]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <FC9CAC5E-B605-4A8F-9F93-33E0F21B2AA0@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A34B4CD0-3BB4-4E81-A472-2659D30B72DB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:25:35 -0600
In-Reply-To: <BYAPR16MB2790DB08333F1E203512D769EA7E0@BYAPR16MB2790.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dots-requirements@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dots-requirements@ietf.org>, Liang Xia <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>, "dots-chairs@ietf.org" <dots-chairs@ietf.org>, "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
To: "Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy" <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com>
References: <155072052056.20358.15761578065156106209.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BYAPR16MB2790DB08333F1E203512D769EA7E0@BYAPR16MB2790.namprd16.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/vDVeMo9Qbn33ZysH2hQdo5YjVaU>
Subject: Re: [Dots] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 17:25:48 -0000
> On Feb 21, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy <TirumaleswarReddy_Konda@McAfee.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> >> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 9:12 AM >> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org> >> Cc: draft-ietf-dots-requirements@ietf.org; Liang Xia >> <frank.xialiang@huawei.com>; dots-chairs@ietf.org; >> frank.xialiang@huawei.com; dots@ietf.org >> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18: (with >> COMMENT) >> >> >> >> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-dots-requirements-18: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email >> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory >> paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dots-requirements/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> - I'm curious what the archival value this has for publishing as an RFC. Did the >> WG consider alternative publication methods? (e.g., leave as a draft, publish in >> a WG wiki) >> >> §1.2: The draft uses 2119/8174 keywords to describe requirements for protocol >> design. That's not really how 2119 defines them. That doesn't prevent using >> them here, but it would be helpful to modify or add to the boilerplate to >> indicate this. > > Sure, added the following line: > These capitalized words are used to signify the requirements for DOTS protocols design. That looks good, thanks! Ben.
- [Dots] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [Dots] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [Dots] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy
- Re: [Dots] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-i… Ben Campbell