[Dots] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)

[Deb Cooley <[e-mail]>]

These have been corrected.  Let me know if there are still things to
correct.

Deb Cooley

p.s. I took the editor off of this reply....

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 8:43 AM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> EID #7058 is OK, not 7911. See my assessment sent last July:
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/MdoJELqXPzy29YLLDGNUnGSxWKE/.
>
> Cheers,
> Med
>
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]>
> > Envoyé : lundi 29 avril 2024 19:43
> > À : Deb Cooley <[e-mail]>; Paul Wouters
> > <[e-mail]>
> > Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET <[e-mail]>;
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; RFC Editor <rfc-
> > [e-mail]>
> > Objet : Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC9132 (7911)
> >
> >
> > Hi Paul and Deb,
> >
> > Because the dots WG has concluded, we are sending this to both of
> > you as ADs of the Security Area.
> >
> > We note that this errata report and EID #7058 (also in Reported
> > state) address the same text in Section 5.3 but have different
> > suggestions for corrected text. Please keep this in mind when you
> > review.
> >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > Fwww.rfc-
> > editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid7911&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
> > orange.com%7C7e8942081b674615330208dc6873dbb1%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb
> > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638500094028430958%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> > b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M
> > n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=YNGhfbByIbptLsAoXLFmT35HiElStasgcMh%2FZH
> > XvIiI%3D&reserved=0
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > Fwww.rfc-
> > editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid7058&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
> > orange.com%7C7e8942081b674615330208dc6873dbb1%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb
> > c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638500094028441442%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> > b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6M
> > n0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Pbw0UXVuuMGPuRXAuv2hBdXD1Dg%2FI2YUSemMNt
> > Z9mco%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Thank you,
> > RFC Editor/rv
> >
> >
> > > On Apr 29, 2024, at 12:50 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-
> > [e-mail]> wrote:
> > >
> > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9132,
> > > "Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat Signaling (DOTS)
> > Signal Channel Specification".
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > You may review the report below and at:
> > >
> > https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2
> > Fwww.
> > > rfc-
> > editor.org%2Ferrata%2Feid7911&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
> > o
> > >
> > range.com%7C7e8942081b674615330208dc6873dbb1%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc
> > 48b92
> > >
> > 53b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638500094028446366%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey
> > JWIjo
> > >
> > iMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7
> > C%7C%
> > >
> > 7C&sdata=UNdLaZ4HmLl%2BXao88s5U4K2%2BPhPQfMIc5Moj7JB8RfA%3D&reser
> > ved=0
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Type: Technical
> > > Reported by: Wolf mark <[e-mail]>
> > >
> > > Section: GLOBAL
> > >
> > > Original Text
> > > -------------
> > > uses data-channel:target {
> > >                when "/dots-signal/scope/conflict-information/"
> > >                   + "conflict-cause = 'overlapping-targets'";
> > >              }
> > >
> > > Corrected Text
> > > --------------
> > > Uses data+channel:claim
> > >             If "/signal-information=conflict
> > >
> > > Notes
> > > -----
> > > Original text is outdated in the technical base
> > >
> > > Corrected text is definitely the real core use in the
> > systematic
> > > technical decorum
> > >
> > > Instructions:
> > > -------------
> > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam,
> > it
> > > will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please
> > use
> > > "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> > rejected. When
> > > a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to
> > change the
> > > status and edit the report, if necessary.
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > RFC9132 (draft-ietf-dots-rfc8782-bis-08)
> > > --------------------------------------
> > > Title               : Distributed Denial-of-Service Open Threat
> > Signaling (DOTS) Signal Channel Specification
> > > Publication Date    : September 2021
> > > Author(s)           : M. Boucadair, Ed., J. Shallow, T. Reddy.K
> > > Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> > > Source              : DDoS Open Threat Signaling
> > > Stream              : IETF
> > > Verifying Party     : IESG
> > >
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
> falsifie. Merci.
>
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
> modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>
>