Re: [Dots] [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 11 September 2018 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dots@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859CB130E80; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 05:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MDq-0v24MdwW; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orange.com (mta135.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56769130E7C; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.67]) by opfednr21.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 428l6r3C6kz5vvN; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:47:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.32]) by opfednr03.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 428l6r2SxzzDq7F; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:47:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILM32.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::8924:188:2124:a046%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 14:47:16 +0200
From: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
To: "core@ietf.org" <core@ietf.org>
CC: "dots@ietf.org" <dots@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: =?utf-8?B?W2NvcmVdIPCflJQgV0cgYWRvcHRpb24gb2YgZHJhZnQtYm91Y2FkYWlyLWNv?= =?utf-8?Q?re-hop-limit?=
Thread-Index: AdRJzZBaCiRnu/S2T1KvnjcE915T5g==
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:47:15 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DFDDE5F@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dots/zgHRtj_U-XnOPTuicPB-mZzRS3M>
Subject: Re: [Dots] =?utf-8?q?=5Bcore=5D_=F0=9F=94=94_WG_adoption_of_draft-bo?= =?utf-8?q?ucadair-core-hop-limit?=
X-BeenThere: dots@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of DDoS Open Threat Signaling \(DOTS\) technology and directions." <dots.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dots/>
List-Post: <mailto:dots@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots>, <mailto:dots-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:47:21 -0000

Hi all,

I support this draft, obviously. 

FWIW, I don't have any IPR related to this draft. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Dots [mailto:dots-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Jon Shallow
> Envoyé : mardi 11 septembre 2018 13:03
> À : core@ietf.org; 'Konda, Tirumaleswar Reddy'; dots@ietf.org
> Objet : Re: [Dots] FW: [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit
> 
> Hi CoRE WG,
> 
> I have read the draft and support it.
> I do not see any issues with it being a WG document.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Jon
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dots [mailto: dots-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Konda, Tirumaleswar
> Reddy
> Sent: 11 September 2018 06:57
> To: dots@ietf.org
> Subject: [Dots] FW: [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Please review https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit-00
> and respond to the WG adoption call in CoRE WG.
> DOTS signal channel is using the Hop-Limit Option defined in this draft.
> 
> Cheers,
> -Tiru
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: core <core-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Carsten Bormann
> Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2018 1:25 AM
> To: Core <core@ietf.org>
> Subject: [core] 🔔 WG adoption of draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit
> 
> This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or
> open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is
> safe.
> 
> It seems we have converged at draft-boucadair-core-hop-limit as the draft
> providing the hop limit function needed by DOTS, but we haven’t done the
> formal WG adoption yet.
> 
> This is a formal call for adoption of this draft as a WG document of the CoRE
> WG.
> If you have read the draft and support adopting it, please say so.
> If you see a problem with adopting it as a WG document, please tell us.
> For both, remember that WG adoption does not mean that we already have
> consensus on all the details, just that this is the right working document to
> address the issue (and that we should address the issue in the first place).
> Please do mention any issues that you already know; these also can be brought
> up in Wednesday’s virtual interim Webex call.
> 
> This formal WG adoption call runs until the end of September 17th.
> (Given the state of the discussion, we might then have a Working Group last
> call of an updated document right next.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> _______________________________________________
> core mailing list
> core@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dots mailing list
> Dots@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dots