Re: [drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Transport Protocol"

"Ali, Syed Wasim" <syed.ali@neustar.biz> Sun, 17 May 2015 13:31 UTC

From: "Ali, Syed Wasim" <syed.ali@neustar.biz>
To: "Cartwright, Ken" <kcartwright@tnsi.com>
Thread-Topic: [drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Transport Protocol"
Thread-Index: AQHQkKW6DczOpLXHnUCqToKKgjy1RQ==
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 13:31:06 +0000
Message-ID: <E04392EB-58B3-4C20-802D-71DEACC2C64E@neustar.biz>
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE075467EA137@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>, <840742d1e8264c9dbc9f71efbb97d0e4@asbwcexcmbx01.win2k.corp.tnsi.com>
In-Reply-To: <840742d1e8264c9dbc9f71efbb97d0e4@asbwcexcmbx01.win2k.corp.tnsi.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/drinks/8pmbfoJYOdqnineoeWVKqFzmkT4>
Cc: "drinks@ietf.org" <drinks@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Transport Protocol"
Precedence: list

+1

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 15, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Cartwright, Ken <kcartwright@tnsi.com> wrote:
> 
> Sound like a good point and a good solution.
> 
> +1 from me.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: drinks [mailto:drinks-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Mayrhofer
> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 10:55 AM
> To: drinks@ietf.org
> Subject: [drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Transport Protocol"
> 
> All,
> 
> I'm currently working through the remaining COMMENTs and "near-DISCUSSes" on our documents, specifically the Framework document:
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Ddrinks-2Dspp-2Dframework_ballot_&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=c982q_qKNPIfj0UrZrP9W283QeLoOWyxJ2JOyD72wXw&m=BdHD3cWWs5RZ_GN-OmlQgLYZ04AhvDJ6goMJophvLdU&s=jFwRyhPvmhHyRYHA-EBf5U15y0V5jc-1oiBxBV1Vhpc&e= 
> 
> There was some significant concern about the use of the term "Transport" for an above-layer-4-protocol, sepcifically by Spencer and Martin. Spencer provided a compromise text, while Martin strongly leans towards changing our terminology. As Spencer wrote, the term "Substrate" could be used  instead of "Transport".
> 
> The SOAP document contains 24 instances of the word "transport", while the framework document contains 54 instances. Therefore, i think it would be reasonable effort to switch to "Substrate", and that would adress both Spencer's as well as Martin's comments.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Alex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> drinks mailing list
> drinks@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_drinks&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=c982q_qKNPIfj0UrZrP9W283QeLoOWyxJ2JOyD72wXw&m=BdHD3cWWs5RZ_GN-OmlQgLYZ04AhvDJ6goMJophvLdU&s=aRItPurjJs8R5s-tVOPNRsGCv58g8bYfE-f-x8feuVM&e= 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)and may
> contain confidential and privileged information of Transaction Network Services.
> Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you
> are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> drinks mailing list
> drinks@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_drinks&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=c982q_qKNPIfj0UrZrP9W283QeLoOWyxJ2JOyD72wXw&m=BdHD3cWWs5RZ_GN-OmlQgLYZ04AhvDJ6goMJophvLdU&s=aRItPurjJs8R5s-tVOPNRsGCv58g8bYfE-f-x8feuVM&e=

[drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Transpo… Alexander Mayrhofer
Re: [drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Tra… Cartwright, Ken
Re: [drinks] "Substrate Protocol" instead of "Tra… Ali, Syed Wasim