IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion

"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com> Tue, 11 August 2009 19:36 UTC

Return-Path: <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEC33A67A8 for <drinks@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.419
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.419 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.180, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wa2oQJYB3Il4 for <drinks@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgate.siemenscomms.co.uk (mailgate.siemenscomms.co.uk [195.171.110.225]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34893A6FE9 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:36:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net ([172.23.15.171]) by siemenscomms.co.uk (PMDF V6.3-x14 #31430) with ESMTP id <0KO800M36910U6@siemenscomms.co.uk> for drinks@ietf.org; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:34:12 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 20:34:13 +0100
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
In-reply-to: <4A81BFFE.8050604@nic.at>
To: Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at>
Message-id: <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0023D2643@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-Topic: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
Thread-Index: AcoatiCSCBhy0bC4Th2UgkiN+ps7DgABAvHg
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B01F18918@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com> <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D46650863B5B0@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at> <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B01FA1C64@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com> <4A803F75.50503@nic.at> <0D5F89FAC29E2C41B98A6A762007F5D0023D229D@GBNTHT12009MSX.gb002.siemens.net> <4A81BFFE.8050604@nic.at>
Cc: drinks@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/drinks>
List-Post: <mailto:drinks@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 19:36:26 -0000

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Otmar Lendl [mailto:lendl@nic.at] 
> Sent: 11 August 2009 20:01
> To: Elwell, John
> Cc: drinks@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
> 
> Elwell, John wrote:
> > Otmar,
> > 
> > Why do you say both WGs are to blame? SPEERMINT does indeed have the
> > LUF/LRF split, so what do you feel is the problem in SPEERMINT?
> 
> John,
> 
> I haven't read the speermint docs (or the mailinglist) in a while, and
> missed the last session, too. But a quick glance at
> draft-ietf-speermint-voip-consolidated-usecases-13 shows fundamental
> LUF/LRF missunderstandings in that document. The SED should 
> be the output
> of the LRF and not the LUF.
[JRE] I see - that does indeed appear to be wrong.

John


> 
> *shrug*
> 
> > Also, perhaps you should post this to the SPEERMINT list too and say
> > that discussions are taking place on the DRINKS list (to 
> avoid ongoing
> > cross-posting).
> 
> I was mentioned by name in this thread, thus I replied here.
> 
> /ol
> -- 
> // Otmar Lendl <lendl@nic.at>, T: +43 1 5056416 - 33, F: - 933 //
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email