Re: [drinks] WG: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database

Daryl Malas <> Tue, 05 April 2016 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4ECA12D149 for <>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:06:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.931
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.931 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oRaKKJRtrb8h for <>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0908612D0EF for <>; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (kyzyl []) by (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u35F5rjA003780; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:05:53 -0600
Received: from ( by (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/407/; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:05:53 -0600 (MDT)
X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/407/
Received: from ([::1]) by ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:05:52 -0600
From: Daryl Malas <>
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: [drinks] WG: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database
Thread-Index: AQHRj0ykCfaPKwKaBE2yvkHD1dGbyw==
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:05:51 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [drinks] WG: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:06:02 -0000

Nice work, Alex! Thanks for persevering through this. It has been a LONG time since we started this effort.


On 4/5/16, 12:57 AM, "drinks on behalf of Alexander Mayrhofer" < on behalf of> wrote:

>FYI - we finally got our last draft to the RFC editor. I hereby declare victory, and will hence work with Ben to shut down the WG. It has been a long way since.... hmm.... Dublin? 
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: [] 
>Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. April 2016 00:52
>An:;;; Alexander Mayrhofer
>Betreff: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database
>We have received notice that your document draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09 has
>been approved for publication as an RFC.  The document has
>been added to the RFC Editor queue and you can check the status at
>If you submitted your XML file using the I-D submission tool, we have
>already retrieved it.  If you did not submit the XML file via the I-D
>submission tool, or if you have an updated version (e.g., updated
>contact information), please send us the XML file at this time.  Please
>attach the file as draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09.xml, and specify 
>any differences between the approved I-D and the document that the XML
>produces.  We recommend using xml2rfc v2 <> to create
>your document.  See the RSE's message about the RFC Editor's transition to
>xml2rfc v2 here 
>If you created this document using -ms nroff, please send us the
>source file.
>This should help increase the pace with which documents move through
>the RFC Editor queue. 
>Please let us know if you have any questions.
>Thank you.
>The RFC Editor Team
>drinks mailing list