[drinks] WG: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database

Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> Tue, 05 April 2016 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
X-Original-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C3812D93C for <drinks@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YWOB9nZdj1hO for <drinks@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.sbg.nic.at (mail.sbg.nic.at []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA76C12D0F3 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 23:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nics-exch2.sbg.nic.at ([]) by mail.sbg.nic.at with XWall v3.52f ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:57:45 +0200
Received: from NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at ([fe80::a5b2:6e42:e54d:9d57]) by NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at ([fe80::a5b2:6e42:e54d:9d57%12]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 08:57:44 +0200
From: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
To: "drinks@ietf.org" <drinks@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database
Thread-Index: AQHRjsTG6iEauP1u8kGDx/S63iAuB5968slw
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 06:57:43 +0000
Message-ID: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE075643374F6@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
References: <20160404225211.2844F180094@rfc-editor.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160404225211.2844F180094@rfc-editor.org>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/drinks/EPhqkF8JHdX-Qbh3I-_rzN8bp1o>
Subject: [drinks] WG: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database
X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/drinks/>
List-Post: <mailto:drinks@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 06:57:50 -0000

FYI - we finally got our last draft to the RFC editor. I hereby declare victory, and will hence work with Ben to shut down the WG. It has been a long way since.... hmm.... Dublin? 


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 05. April 2016 00:52
An: kcartwright@tnsi.com; vbhatia@tnsi.com; jfm@cablelabs.com; Alexander Mayrhofer
Cc: drinks-ads@ietf.org; drinks-chairs@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org; syed.ali@neustar.biz
Betreff: [RFC State] <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09> has been added to the RFC Editor database


We have received notice that your document draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09 has
been approved for publication as an RFC.  The document has
been added to the RFC Editor queue and you can check the status at

If you submitted your XML file using the I-D submission tool, we have
already retrieved it.  If you did not submit the XML file via the I-D
submission tool, or if you have an updated version (e.g., updated
contact information), please send us the XML file at this time.  Please
attach the file as draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap-09.xml, and specify 
any differences between the approved I-D and the document that the XML
produces.  We recommend using xml2rfc v2 <http://xml2rfc.ietf.org/> to create
your document.  See the RSE's message about the RFC Editor's transition to
xml2rfc v2 here 

If you created this document using -ms nroff, please send us the
source file.

This should help increase the pace with which documents move through
the RFC Editor queue. 

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thank you.

The RFC Editor Team