Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
"Guyton, Deborah A" <dguyton@telcordia.com> Thu, 30 July 2009 06:42 UTC
Return-Path: <dguyton@telcordia.com>
X-Original-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: drinks@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4053A6DC8 for <drinks@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:42:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kyvaoyUUJogk for <drinks@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dnsmx2pya.telcordia.com (dnsmx2pya.telcordia.com [128.96.20.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773603A6838 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rrc-dte-ieg01.dte.telcordia.com (rrc-dte-ieg01.cc.telcordia.com [128.96.20.22]) by dnsmx2pya.telcordia.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6U6gWfQ008113 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:42:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-AuditID: 80601416-000010b0000018a4-1d-4a7140d55697
Received: from rrc-dte-exhb1.dte.telcordia.com ([128.96.20.12]) by rrc-dte-ieg01.dte.telcordia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:42:29 -0400
Received: from rrc-dte-exmb2.dte.telcordia.com ([128.96.180.27]) by rrc-dte-exhb1.dte.telcordia.com ([128.96.20.12]) with mapi; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:42:29 -0400
From: "Guyton, Deborah A" <dguyton@telcordia.com>
To: "'PFAUTZ, PENN L, ATTCORP'" <ppfautz@att.com>, Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>, "drinks@ietf.org" <drinks@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 02:42:28 -0400
Thread-Topic: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
Thread-Index: AcoO2bJ+NAGUY74URde2rAIW8CFO0wAASmUAAGuYGvAAFaa4wA==
Message-ID: <AE85DAD2723E724EAB2A704148DE15AC27FC0E2D5F@rrc-dte-exmb2.dte.telcordia.com>
References: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B01F18918@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com> <8BC845943058D844ABFC73D2220D46650863B5B0@nics-mail.sbg.nic.at> <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B01FA1C64@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <35FE871E2B085542A35726420E29DA6B01FA1C64@gaalpa1msgusr7a.ugd.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion
X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/drinks>
List-Post: <mailto:drinks@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 06:42:33 -0000
Hi Penn, Hopefully I can clear up one item quickly. The idea of "Registrant" is the notion that a "Registrar" who is the "holder" of the data or carrier of record, for example, might outsource the administration of that data to a "Registrant". An analogy in today's world is that some companies do not manage their own data in LERG but outsource to a third party. It may be necessary to allow for an individual administrator "Joe Administrator" to be the responsible individual for administering that data - hence having a login and password (particularly for a GUI) but could be a login and password for a service provisioning interface. For data issues, you might need to resolve with a person. If administration is done as it is today, perhaps for AT&T, Registrar = AT&T and Registrant = AT&T. Hope that helps. Debbie -----Original Message----- From: drinks-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:drinks-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of PFAUTZ, PENN L, ATTCORP Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:39 PM To: Alexander Mayrhofer; drinks@ietf.org Subject: Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Alex: My concerns are not entirely with respect to the current draft but some of the directions that the discussion during the WG session suggested the work might be taking. I've had a lingering concern about the disconnect between what Speermint has proposed (LUF/LRF)and the route that drinks has taken. Since the will of the design team seemed to be to get on with a simple protocol directed toward provisioning DNS RRs I let that ride. Monday's session, however brought up things like more abstraction of routing elements which suggests to me assumptions about the nature of interconnections and my issues with the original ESPP I-D. Brian Rosen's comment about number "ownership" relations also seemed to suggest another complexity that the protocol would try to incorporate. I get concerned about a protocol that either makes a lot of specific assumptions about the nature of the registry and the interconnection framework and/or becomes bloated by trying to incorporate the panoply of possible cases. A more specific issue - the definition of Registrant as an "end user" - this is at least confusing in the context of Infrastructure vs. End User ENUM. I'll keep watching how things evolve. It may be that others conclude they need the added complexity but I wanted to be forthright about my position. Thanks for listening. Penn Pfautz AT&T Access Management +1-732-420-4962 -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Mayrhofer [mailto:alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at] Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 12:56 PM To: PFAUTZ, PENN L, ATTCORP; drinks@ietf.org Subject: RE: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion > I for one have concerns about how useful the resulting > protocol is likely to be, at least for my company's likely > applications. Penn, Thanks for that "wakeup call" - as we said we want definitely a deployable protocol, so i'm concerned about your statement - could you elaborate of what properties of the current draft would make it less useful for your company's applications, and what could be done to make it fit better? Thanks Alex _______________________________________________ drinks mailing list drinks@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks
- [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion PFAUTZ, PENN L, ATTCORP
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Andrew Newton
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion PFAUTZ, PENN L, ATTCORP
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Guyton, Deborah A
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Brian Rosen
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion PFAUTZ, PENN L, ATTCORP
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Otmar Lendl
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Elwell, John
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Cartwright, Kenneth
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Elwell, John
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Elwell, John
- Re: [drinks] Comment on today's drinks discussion Otmar Lendl