[drinks] [IANA #807166] AW: Evaluation: <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework-09.txt> to Proposed Standard

"Pearl Liang via RT" <drafts-eval@iana.org> Wed, 04 February 2015 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B48A1A0404; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:24:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.19
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GN4bXVM0FKHE; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.lax.icann.org (smtp01.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BCB71A0065; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 08:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t14GOoF0014520; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:24:50 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B7449C20396; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 16:24:50 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: Nobody
From: Pearl Liang via RT <drafts-eval@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE07546743484@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
References: <RT-Ticket-807166@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-806866@icann.org> <20150202150942.30670.88202.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-14468-1423004721-870.806866-7-0@icann.org> <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE07546743484@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-30030-1423067090-558.807166-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #807166
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: pearl.liang@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:24:50 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/drinks/ZfO3OcmXqWlKo47TXd0xNiMhyVU>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 00:22:31 -0800
Cc: drinks@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework.all@tools.ietf.org, drinks-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [drinks] [IANA #807166] AW: Evaluation: <draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework-09.txt> to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-eval@iana.org
List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/drinks/>
List-Post: <mailto:drinks@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 16:24:52 -0000

HI Alex,

> Anyways, i will go back to your original mail, and answer the question
> right away.

Great!  The question is about action #3 for section 11.2.  That "Upon review, 
the experts have approved this one." was for Actions #1 and #2.

Thanks,
~pl

On Wed Feb 04 07:56:36 2015, alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at wrote:
> Hello Pearl,
> 
> > IANA NOT OK.  Comments in tracker
> > IANA Actions - YES
> >
> > Question, posted  in the Last Call comment (ticket 802710) and the
> > tracker,
> > about IANA action #3 for section 11.2 of this draft has not been
> > answered.
> >
> > Thank you,
> 
> I understand there was a question about the draft, however, i also
> understood that message of yours:
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/drinks/current/msg01310.html
> 
> Where you said "Upon review, the experts have approved this one." and
> therefore i had the impression the issue was solved by that subsequent
> review.
> 
> Anyways, i will go back to your original mail, and answer the question
> right away.
> 
> thanks,
> Alex
>