Re: [drinks] Your COMMENT on draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 12 August 2015 15:09 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD971A8A0E for <drinks@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dpFYEaVcXKxs for <drinks@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEBC81A8A23 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.23] (cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t7CF9JIq049057 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:09:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-70-119-203-4.tx.res.rr.com [70.119.203.4] claimed to be [10.0.1.23]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Alexander Mayrhofer" <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:09:19 -0500
Message-ID: <9F37B4F8-3A6F-42A5-8199-5F54506020CE@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE075468BCD98@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE075468BCD98@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.2r5107)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/drinks/rvjjybDMIsO-M6on8y4lr6qD100>
Cc: drinks@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [drinks] Your COMMENT on draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework
X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/drinks/>
List-Post: <mailto:drinks@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 15:09:31 -0000

Thanks for the response! Please see inline for responses; I deleted 
stuff where my comments would have taken the form of "Okay".

Ben.

On 12 Aug 2015, at 9:49, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

> Hello Ben,

[...]

>
> -- 8, 2nd paragraph: "XML specifications and _examples_ ... MUST be 
> interpreted..."
>
> Does this imply that the examples are normative?
>
> Also I'm not sure what you mean by "interpreted in the character case 
> presented"
>
> ALEX--> The intention behind this is that casing of the XML must be 
> preserved. The examples are not normative. Therefore, I propose to 
> simply remove "and examples" from this sentence. Furthermore the word 
> "interpreted" is maybe the culprit here, and I suggest to change that 
> to "Unless stated otherwise, the character casing of XML 
> specifications in this document MUST be preserved to develop a 
> conforming specification" - would this work?

Yes, thanks!

>
> Please advice whether you would like to see a revised document, or an 
> RFC Editor note writeup, and I can produce the respective text later 
> tonight.

While the changes would probably be small, I suspect they are scattered 
around enough that it would be easiest to submit a new version. Please 
go ahead and submit it when you are ready.