Re: [drinks] Your COMMENT on draft-ietf-drinks-spp-framework

["Ben Campbell" <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the response! Please see inline for responses; I deleted 
stuff where my comments would have taken the form of "Okay".

Ben.

On 12 Aug 2015, at 9:49, Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:

> Hello Ben,

[...]

>
> -- 8, 2nd paragraph: "XML specifications and _examples_ ... MUST be 
> interpreted..."
>
> Does this imply that the examples are normative?
>
> Also I'm not sure what you mean by "interpreted in the character case 
> presented"
>
> ALEX--> The intention behind this is that casing of the XML must be 
> preserved. The examples are not normative. Therefore, I propose to 
> simply remove "and examples" from this sentence. Furthermore the word 
> "interpreted" is maybe the culprit here, and I suggest to change that 
> to "Unless stated otherwise, the character casing of XML 
> specifications in this document MUST be preserved to develop a 
> conforming specification" - would this work?

Yes, thanks!

>
> Please advice whether you would like to see a revised document, or an 
> RFC Editor note writeup, and I can produce the respective text later 
> tonight.

While the changes would probably be small, I suspect they are scattered 
around enough that it would be easiest to submit a new version. Please 
go ahead and submit it when you are ready.