Re: [drinks] Shepherd wanted: Publication of draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> Tue, 21 October 2014 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rlb@ipv.sx>
X-Original-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: drinks@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D3C1A1ADF for <drinks@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g06EsgCkdMuO for <drinks@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B9E1A1B28 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id la4so318739vcb.13 for <drinks@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=941gv5TiVf9H6zUvNUs4fCqcm7TKwCrYTrcvbJm3bQI=; b=XXaHbI3Bmdbe0EXnJM9bHwuyqPIHw0fGmW9BGMJbGFXP7sxA4Kc2Kkk4P0BarewNK7 J+RXaldNYwqDfKagodLuaPPRArVgPJ5McnLceBRGMp/NvPybuxq9DhKaQYpdZqlxVqqK Rfh2fy2sU/WLR2WJsA5rJbx8+OoWNz1ruIsHPwY+QoROgWejm2UREc5jpDPsmOZTEEf/ i0snSSm0kWeIdrAVHUfFYxjWweKc3Xip05snLUQ0S8QhIHnrbFhXP0gTX0HF1Id2C40W UkfwhKy6VuIqninuTfoTyNs9tNRTVvVHlUHp3fdqeYNlFwx2Al25I5jctB3MsdyJk0IJ c92g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm7VCy1BOqNKjAhAFxkSJCoPFUhBK4szUiFzkZTTVJ5sDyJP/3tEueQ/9Vs1oxE89SZXsoZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.251.136 with SMTP id zk8mr671840vdc.51.1413893026538; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.31.149.205 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0753E0EF776@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
References: <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0752682F810@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at> <CAL02cgSLheAu3a_tNjuPLeXHF4eK+oq_V4UZ6x-jG=gX82kO=g@mail.gmail.com> <19F54F2956911544A32543B8A9BDE0753E0EF776@NICS-EXCH2.sbg.nic.at>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:03:46 -0400
Message-ID: <CAL02cgTk3AB27reRGMFL9DueJT3ajfPRu3=rzYXTx1HwmX62kg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
To: Alexander Mayrhofer <alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1133ef2498fc910505ed9f19"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/drinks/unjpY-RROVBP1khW14fnA74y_DI
Cc: "drinks@ietf.org" <drinks@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [drinks] Shepherd wanted: Publication of draft-ietf-drinks-spp-protocol-over-soap
X-BeenThere: drinks@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DRINKS WG <drinks.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/drinks/>
List-Post: <mailto:drinks@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/drinks>, <mailto:drinks-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:04:09 -0000

Thanks, Alex.  Let's get this pub-req'ed and on the telechat!

On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Alexander Mayrhofer <
alexander.mayrhofer@nic.at> wrote:

> Richard Barnes wrote:
> > If there's interest in these drafts being published, a shepherd needs to
> step up.
> > It doesn't take much time, and it can be a good opportunity to learn
> about how
> > a draft becomes an RFC.
>
> I'm glad to say that Syed volunteered to shepherd the SOAP document :-). I
> can shepherd the framework document, and therefore we will be able to
> request publication for both documents shortly.
>
> The drafts are set to expire in two days, so we might need another "empty"
> revision to keep them active WG documents. I will check that, and email
> authors privately if there's the need for a revision.
>
> Alex
>
>
>