Re: [Driu] [DNSOP] Resolverless DNS Side Meeting in Montreal

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Tue, 10 July 2018 13:28 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: driu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: driu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA995130E78; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:28:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1xmSoNHA8IMm; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:28:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (www.ducksong.com [192.155.95.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00B9130E9D; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (mail-oi0-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3CE153A026; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:28:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 13-v6so42582469ois.1; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0Nlcy1MzoSORNP8Klhwp7uC6qp5oWnCV4sweEEegwLbD871MfH MSqagI/3L4hPCSVaaUAH3tiOqLfMTjcQLF0tRKY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpddJX+GMF9Ubh/Zt1sdM63rBsPA9+JKqAhpZLIYNEQVNnQuiubsN33mHDdXkyhF+FDwBIwvRq7pjNf5tQlUYqo=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:e7c8:: with SMTP id e191-v6mr25581825oih.132.1531229323894; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 2002:a4a:8a22:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 06:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m1fcoe5-0000GuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
References: <CAOdDvNp0S5-aEzy4ziqVvL1Kd+V79nD49_Zuo1dLoThXYP7nFg@mail.gmail.com> <m1fcoe5-0000GuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:28:43 -0400
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrFs00665SAvfb=fP7=XsrSiQ-MKkFCcxGnuPJpJ7fGxw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrFs00665SAvfb=fP7=XsrSiQ-MKkFCcxGnuPJpJ7fGxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-3@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, driu@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ebce400570a51bea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/driu/7lmLCw9aRV0zlF_e-hZSSXWxx0g>
Subject: Re: [Driu] [DNSOP] Resolverless DNS Side Meeting in Montreal
X-BeenThere: driu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "DNS Resolver Identification and Use \(DRIU\)." <driu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/driu>, <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/driu/>
List-Post: <mailto:driu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/driu>, <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 13:28:47 -0000

> Assuming that in the context of DoH reply size is not an issue, is seems to
> me that this use case is already solved by DNSSEC. Just push all required
> signatures, key material and DS records that allow the receiving side to
> validate the additional information.
>
>
that validates its a valid dns record. And maybe that's the whole answer -
at which point we still need to write that down along with the scope of
where its valid.

otoh - maybe its not the same valid dns record another resolver might want
you to use. perhaps you have a stronger trust relationship with that other
resolver. hmm.

otoh - maybe an unsigned record is ok in an https context where DNS isn't
the https security model.

this is the kind of stuff that I expect is in scope for discussion.


> Are you trying to re-invent DNSSEC for people who don't want to deploy
> DNSSEC


no.