Re: [Driu] [DNSOP] SRV and HTTP

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 11 July 2018 01:37 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: driu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: driu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87A9130EAB; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id peqrUSp4J1Pb; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAD30130DD6; Tue, 10 Jul 2018 18:37:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4A73AB041; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82A1E160072; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B13016006B; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id iRbvBX2HhmUx; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:37:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.30.42.67] (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1B5D16006A; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:37:20 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <7A9000F5-0772-49FC-BDBB-862C8141BA54@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:37:16 +1000
Cc: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>, dnsop@ietf.org, DoH WG <doh@ietf.org>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, driu@ietf.org, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <57193515-CDC7-442A-892F-D0DDF259B1E6@isc.org>
References: <m1fcoe5-0000GuC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1807101056140.5219@bofh.nohats.ca> <4a845808-5348-d6e4-dda2-59aaf0e85c14@nostrum.com> <3DF5A66C-CCBF-4116-A1FC-35CF8E05808B@hopcount.ca> <e1675184-f0bc-670d-3db1-b99a9daf1657@nostrum.com> <CAJhMdTOZtOpF_aK-ZzP0DfkDMcAtTKFLdSpKkrSPvP1cOgnOjQ@mail.gmail.com> <e658445a-242b-5f94-f1fc-0bc4c850319d@nostrum.com> <CAJhMdTOPjhbOK=NQijnYZ3kCY_+f-87n7wwwuR38ifHUG5msqA@mail.gmail.com> <F6C1AF50-EB1B-4E09-9A72-229AD4AC7E57@mnot.net> <82099DED-CCB6-4CDC-BFE6-97B1AB3EB0A4@isc.org> <7A9000F5-0772-49FC-BDBB-862C8141BA54@mnot.net>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/driu/a2KOLyV0yO2VxrF3UehnZJ1cmmw>
Subject: Re: [Driu] [DNSOP] SRV and HTTP
X-BeenThere: driu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "DNS Resolver Identification and Use \(DRIU\)." <driu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/driu>, <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/driu/>
List-Post: <mailto:driu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/driu>, <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 01:37:28 -0000

Fine by me.

> On 11 Jul 2018, at 11:32 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:
> 
> I didn't find those, but I found many others.
> 
> I'll start collecting. How about Tuesday, say 6:45-7:45pm?
> 
> 
> 
>> On 11 Jul 2018, at 11:30 am, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>; wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 11 Jul 2018, at 11:22 am, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 11 Jul 2018, at 3:55 am, Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>; wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 10, 2018, at 18:02, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>; wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> In large part because DNS provides "a richer scheme that accommodates address families and multiple addresses with priorities".
>>>> 
>>>> *cups hand to ear*
>>>> 
>>>> Was that the sound of a distant desire to specify use of SRV for HTTP?
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> I recently did some digging on this topic, and can try to characterise what the issues / objections are.
>> 
>> I think there are three main objections.
>> 
>> 1) Wildcards don’t work with prefixes.
>> 2) Additional data isn’t always returned it may require multiple round trips.
>> 3) Additional data processing doesn’t support negative responses.
>> 
>> All of these issues are trivially easy to fix.  It just require willingness to implement.
>> 
>> 1) is addressed by defining a new type(s) rather than using prefixes.
>> 2) is addressed by getting recursive servers to fill in missing additional data before returning.  Named has code in review for this for SRV as proof of concept.
>> 3) is addressed by adding some signalling between the client and recursive server to indicate if the additional section is complete or not.
>> 
>> 
>>> Would people be interested in a (hopefully brief) side meeting to discuss and maybe come to a shared understanding of the problem space?
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> DNSOP mailing list
>>> DNSOP@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>> 
>> -- 
>> Mark Andrews, ISC
>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org