Re: [Driu] [Ext] Proposed agenda

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Wed, 20 June 2018 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: driu@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: driu@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4C8130EA8 for <driu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:24:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kHfk_vc15VJh for <driu@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BC312F1A2 for <driu@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.46.144.157] (unknown [209.59.114.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B428FDA; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:24:43 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
In-Reply-To: <9E3F44F6-30BE-440E-A73F-95E9EB0F3674@icann.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 12:24:43 -0400
Cc: "driu@ietf.org" <driu@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5FF77729-FEB7-4E0E-9D20-DC75DC829ACD@bangj.com>
References: <9976F5D7-864E-4F85-9232-866150EF53D1@icann.org> <7A7BA397-728F-432D-A449-D040D1D8B363@bangj.com> <9E3F44F6-30BE-440E-A73F-95E9EB0F3674@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/driu/yvuQ02UaYCNdMm49T2VkCPL5xq8>
Subject: Re: [Driu] [Ext] Proposed agenda
X-BeenThere: driu@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: "DNS Resolver Identification and Use \(DRIU\)." <driu.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/driu>, <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/driu/>
List-Post: <mailto:driu@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/driu>, <mailto:driu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 16:24:48 -0000


> On Jun 20, 2018, at 12:22 PM, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
> 
> On Jun 20, 2018, at 9:18 AM, Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I expect much of the discussion of DHCP to get bogged down in the threat analysis of providing secure DNS configuration over DHCP. I think this would be better served by creating a separate agenda item for discussion. As mentioned before, I have written a threat document here but continue to work on it.
>> 
>> https://github.com/pusateri/draft-tpwt-dhc-dns-discovery/blob/master/threat.md [github.com]
> 
> Does this sound better?
> DHCPv6 Options for private DNS Discovery: 15 mins (Tom Pusateri and Willem Toorop)
> Secure DNS Configuration over DHCP: 15 mins (Tom Pusateri and Willem Toorop)
> 
> --Paul Hoffman

Can we reverse the order? I think Ted would argue that we should decide if it’s something we want to do before we show how we would do it.
‘
Tom