Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD
Barry Finkel <b19141@achilles.ctd.anl.gov> Fri, 28 July 2000 20:12 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA05033 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:12:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA13184; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:11:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:11:32 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA13160; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:11:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from achilles.ctd.anl.gov (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA13134; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:11:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from achilles.ctd.anl.gov (146.137.32.1 -> achilles.ctd.anl.gov) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Fri, 28 Jul 2000 16:11:27 -0400
Received: by achilles.ctd.anl.gov (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id PAA14923; Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:11:21 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2000 15:11:21 -0500
From: Barry Finkel <b19141@achilles.ctd.anl.gov>
Message-Id: <200007282011.PAA14923@achilles.ctd.anl.gov>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD
In-Reply-To: Mail from 'Keith Moore <moore@cs.utk.edu>' dated: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 23:30:45 -0400
Cc: moore@cs.utk.edu
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Keith Moore wrote: > [A] An implementation that does not adhere to each of the "MUST" and "MUST >NOT" requirements is not considered to be conforming to this specification. Is there a semantic difference between "is not considered to be conforming" vs. "is considered not to be conforming" vs. "is considered to be non-conforming" I am not sure. To me, the latter two seem stronger. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Electronics and Computing Technologies Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-9689 Building 221, Room B236 Internet: BSFinkel@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4844 IBMMAIL: I1004994
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Nick Shelness/SSW/Lotus
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Keith Moore
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD D. J. Bernstein
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Michael Scharff
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Bart Schaefer
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Keith Moore
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Barry Finkel
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Keith Moore
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Charles Lindsey
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Kai Henningsen
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Robert Elz
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Dave Crocker
- Re: 2nd suggested revision for MUST/SHOULD Charles Lindsey
- Re: history of using a comment for display-name? Eric Allman