Antwort: Re: history of using a comment for display-name?
<Bernhard.Garmann@viaginterkom.de> Fri, 16 March 2001 10:19 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (cs.utk.edu [220.127.116.11])
by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id FAA01403
for <email@example.com>; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:19:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id FAA13359; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:19:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:19:08 -0500
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id FAA13335; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:19:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from styx.viaginterkom.de (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id FAA13315; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:19:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from styx.viaginterkom.de (18.104.22.168 -> styx.viaginterkom.de) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Fri, 16 Mar 2001 05:19:05 -0500
Received: (qmail 28975 invoked by uid 0); 16 Mar 2001 10:19:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO muc8lx01.viaginterkom.de) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 16 Mar 2001 10:19:03 -0000
Received: by muc8lx01.viaginterkom.de(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999)) id C1256A11.0038ABEF ; Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:19:00 +0100
To: firstname.lastname@example.org (Kai Henningsen)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 11:18:42 +0100
Subject: Antwort: Re: history of using a comment for display-name?
Content-type: multipart/mixed; Boundary="0__=sqykhGiKr6cNjnxdaebOoFsH3slgbWysZhyNf7CwxsTHpSXENGC5CMZM"
RFC 680 is online at: http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc680.html MfG B.Garmann email@example.com (Kai Henningsen) am 15.03.2001 23:03:00 An: firstname.lastname@example.org Kopie: (Blindkopie: Bernhard Garmann/EXTERN/VIAGInterkom) Thema: Re: history of using a comment for display-name? email@example.com (Dave Crocker) wrote on 12.03.01 in <firstname.lastname@example.org>om>: > At 04:27 AM 3/12/2001, Sam Roberts wrote: > >Does anybody know when the habit of using a comment after > >the addr-spec started? It seems strange to me that > >anybody would do that, when RFC 822 already had a way to > >associate a phrase with an address. > > > >Did the practice predate the rfc? It seems brain-damaged. > > RFC822 did not adequately describe name <address> as the required form. I > believe that sendmail started the practise of doing address (name). It looks like RFC 724 (12 May 1977, Pogran, Vittal, Crocker, Henderson) introduced both the phrase and the comment. (Neither are in 561, and 680 is not online.) From the descriptions, it seems that the phrase was supposed to be meaningful to the MTA, whereas the examples for the comment show usage for human-readable names. RFC 733 is already very much like 822, even though it still talks about FTP servers. MfG Kai
- Antwort: Re: history of using a comment for displ… Bernhard.Garmann