IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: HELO procedural notes

"D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to> Thu, 27 July 2000 20:14 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA21842 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:14:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA01616; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:13:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:13:56 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA01598; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:13:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id QAA01585; Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:13:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from muncher.math.uic.edu (131.193.178.181 -> koobera.math.uic.edu) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Thu, 27 Jul 2000 16:13:53 -0400
Received: (qmail 20076 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jul 2000 20:14:15 -0000
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 20:14:15 -0000
Message-ID: <20000727201415.6819.qmail@cr.yp.to>
From: "D. J. Bernstein" <djb@cr.yp.to>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: HELO procedural notes
References: <20000723191750.28598.qmail@cr.yp.to> <5667759.3173688976@nifty-jr.west.sun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>

Section 2.2.1 says ``clients SHOULD preferentially utilize EHLO rather
than HELO,'' which is in blatant violation of the decision I quoted from
Leiba's meeting notes.

---Dan

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email