Re: Negotiated noncompliance
DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com> Tue, 22 August 2000 21:45 UTC
Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16456 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:45:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA14877; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:58 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA14843; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA14822; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (192.9.25.1 -> mercury.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:55 -0400
Received: from westmail2.West.Sun.COM ([129.153.100.30]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15650 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nifty-jr.west.sun.com (nifty-jr.West.Sun.COM [129.153.12.95]) by westmail2.West.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v1.7) with ESMTP id OAA21191 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:43:20 -0700
From: DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Negotiated noncompliance
Message-ID: <2882397.3175944200@nifty-jr.west.sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0008180911510.11941-100000@draco.cus.cam.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.4 (MacOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The chair's observations about this thread: * There is more support than opposition for wording along these lines, but not yet a rough concensus. * There is a distinct lack of concensus on specific wording. This thread is open for debate, please speak up if you believe you have something to say that has not yet been said. If someone believes they can distill the concerns expressed on this thread into precise wording, please start a new thread where rough concensus on that specific wording can be determined based on the "Procedures for Moving Forward". - DRUMS WG Chair
- Negotiated noncompliance John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Dave Crocker
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Eliot Lear
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Dave Crocker
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Eliot Lear
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Charles Lindsey
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Barry Leiba
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Chris Newman
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance John Gardiner Myers
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Charles Lindsey
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Philip Hazel
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance DRUMS WG Chair
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Eliot Lear
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Keith Moore
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Robert Elz
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Philip Hazel
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Robert Elz
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Charles Lindsey
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Russ Allbery
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Claus Färber
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Graham Klyne
- Re: Negotiated noncompliance Barry Finkel