IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Negotiated noncompliance

DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com> Tue, 22 August 2000 21:45 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA16456 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:45:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA14877; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:45:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:58 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA14843; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id RAA14822; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (192.9.25.1 -> mercury.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Tue, 22 Aug 2000 17:44:55 -0400
Received: from westmail2.West.Sun.COM ([129.153.100.30]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15650 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nifty-jr.west.sun.com (nifty-jr.West.Sun.COM [129.153.12.95]) by westmail2.West.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v1.7) with ESMTP id OAA21191 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 14:43:20 -0700
From: DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com>
To: drums@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Negotiated noncompliance
Message-ID: <2882397.3175944200@nifty-jr.west.sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0008180911510.11941-100000@draco.cus.cam.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.4 (MacOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

The chair's observations about this thread:

* There is more support than opposition for wording along these lines, but 
not yet a rough concensus.

* There is a distinct lack of concensus on specific wording.

This thread is open for debate, please speak up if you believe you have 
something to say that has not yet been said.

If someone believes they can distill the concerns expressed on this thread 
into precise wording, please start a new thread where rough concensus on 
that specific wording can be determined based on the "Procedures for Moving 
Forward".

		- DRUMS WG Chair

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status