Re: SMTP draft issues (4)

DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com> Thu, 17 August 2000 18:24 UTC

Received: from cs.utk.edu (CS.UTK.EDU [128.169.94.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA02066 for <drums-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:24:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with SMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA22206; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:24:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by cs.utk.edu (bulk_mailer v1.13); Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:24:13 -0400
Received: by cs.utk.edu (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA22183; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:24:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (marvin@localhost) by cs.utk.edu with ESMTP (cf v2.9s-UTK) id OAA22150; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:24:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (192.9.25.1 -> mercury.Sun.COM) by cs.utk.edu (smtpshim v1.0); Thu, 17 Aug 2000 14:24:10 -0400
Received: from westmail2.West.Sun.COM ([129.153.100.30]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07573 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nifty-jr.west.sun.com (nifty-jr.West.Sun.COM [129.153.12.95]) by westmail2.West.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL, v1.7) with ESMTP id LAA12542 for <drums@cs.utk.edu>; Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 11:22:49 -0700
From: DRUMS WG Chair <chris.newman@innosoft.com>
To: Detailed Revision/Update of Message Standards <drums@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: SMTP draft issues (4)
Message-ID: <2930684.3175500169@nifty-jr.west.sun.com>
In-Reply-To: <2689063.3175496152@localhost>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.3 (MacOS)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:drums-request@cs.utk.edu?Subject=unsubscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--On Thursday, August 17, 2000 10:15 -0700 DRUMS WG Chair 
<chris.newman@INNOSOFT.COM> wrote:
> "Negotiated noncompliance"
>	 Unless 3 additional people express support, debate is closed

Sorry, I didn't notice I was in disconnected mode when I wrote that. 
Revised Status:

"Negotiated noncompliance"
	Debate is open, but rough concensus lacking on initial proposed text
	If we don't have signs of rough concensus around new text by
	2000-08-24, issue will be ruled a rathole.

		- DRUMS WG Chair